Connect with us

Section 230

President Trump’s Anti-Section 230 Executive Order ‘Radical,’ says Sen. Ron Wyden

Elijah Labby

Published

on

Photo of Sen. Ron Wyden in August 2018 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture

June 3, 2020 — The actions that President Donald Trump has taken to punish tech companies for alleged anti-conservative discrimination are radical, said Section 230 co-author Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., in an Aspen Institute webinar Tuesday.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects tech platforms from legal liability for non-criminal third party content on their websites. But Trump and several conservative critics have long argued that such protections are invalid when platforms begin playing an active role in content moderation.

When Twitter placed a warning label on one of Trump’s tweets last week, the president promised to make good on a longstanding threat to punish the platform.

Wyden said that the actions Trump is taking are an example of the president’s continued overreach in private business and lack of respect for the media.

“Donald Trump is waging an all-out war on the press, and pretty much anybody who seeks to hold him accountable, or actually disagrees with his lies, including on Twitter,” he said.

Section 230, Wyden explained, was intended to be a “sword and shield” to protect against small companies, organizations and movements against legal liability for what users post on their websites.

However, Wyden claimed that the statute’s interpretation had expanded beyond its original scope. Wyden said that he and his colleagues did not draft Section 230 with protections for big tech in mind and that he believes they are abusing their power in their data collection practices.

“I’ve got a lot of reservations about what big tech companies are doing today with respect to violating Americans’ privacy,” he said.

Although he is expressed discomfort with the ways interpretations of Section 230 have evolved, Wyden argued that the government should not abandon the legislation. It is an important protection for online forums and, by extension, the First Amendment, he said.

“I can tell you that Americans don’t want to be at the mercy of speech police online or anywhere else,” he added.

It is unclear how Trump’s Executive Order will hold up, although Twitter is likely to take legal action in response.

Broadband Mapping

In Discussing ‘Broadband and the Biden Administration,’ Trump and Obama Transition Workers Praise Auctions

Liana Sowa

Published

on

Screenshot from the November 2 Broadband Breakfast Live Online webcast

June 3, 2020 — The actions that President Donald Trump has taken to punish tech companies for alleged anti-conservative discrimination are radical, said Section 230 co-author Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., in an Aspen Institute webinar Tuesday.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects tech platforms from legal liability for non-criminal third party content on their websites. But Trump and several conservative critics have long argued that such protections are invalid when platforms begin playing an active role in content moderation.

When Twitter placed a warning label on one of Trump’s tweets last week, the president promised to make good on a longstanding threat to punish the platform.

Wyden said that the actions Trump is taking are an example of the president’s continued overreach in private business and lack of respect for the media.

“Donald Trump is waging an all-out war on the press, and pretty much anybody who seeks to hold him accountable, or actually disagrees with his lies, including on Twitter,” he said.

Section 230, Wyden explained, was intended to be a “sword and shield” to protect against small companies, organizations and movements against legal liability for what users post on their websites.

However, Wyden claimed that the statute’s interpretation had expanded beyond its original scope. Wyden said that he and his colleagues did not draft Section 230 with protections for big tech in mind and that he believes they are abusing their power in their data collection practices.

“I’ve got a lot of reservations about what big tech companies are doing today with respect to violating Americans’ privacy,” he said.

Although he is expressed discomfort with the ways interpretations of Section 230 have evolved, Wyden argued that the government should not abandon the legislation. It is an important protection for online forums and, by extension, the First Amendment, he said.

“I can tell you that Americans don’t want to be at the mercy of speech police online or anywhere else,” he added.

It is unclear how Trump’s Executive Order will hold up, although Twitter is likely to take legal action in response.

Continue Reading

Section 230

GOP Senators Call Platforms ‘Publishers’ and Want to Strip Section 230 Protections, and Dems Aren’t Fans Either

Liana Sowa

Published

on

Photo from the hearing room in Dirksen Senate Office Building by Liana Sowa

June 3, 2020 — The actions that President Donald Trump has taken to punish tech companies for alleged anti-conservative discrimination are radical, said Section 230 co-author Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., in an Aspen Institute webinar Tuesday.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects tech platforms from legal liability for non-criminal third party content on their websites. But Trump and several conservative critics have long argued that such protections are invalid when platforms begin playing an active role in content moderation.

When Twitter placed a warning label on one of Trump’s tweets last week, the president promised to make good on a longstanding threat to punish the platform.

Wyden said that the actions Trump is taking are an example of the president’s continued overreach in private business and lack of respect for the media.

“Donald Trump is waging an all-out war on the press, and pretty much anybody who seeks to hold him accountable, or actually disagrees with his lies, including on Twitter,” he said.

Section 230, Wyden explained, was intended to be a “sword and shield” to protect against small companies, organizations and movements against legal liability for what users post on their websites.

However, Wyden claimed that the statute’s interpretation had expanded beyond its original scope. Wyden said that he and his colleagues did not draft Section 230 with protections for big tech in mind and that he believes they are abusing their power in their data collection practices.

“I’ve got a lot of reservations about what big tech companies are doing today with respect to violating Americans’ privacy,” he said.

Although he is expressed discomfort with the ways interpretations of Section 230 have evolved, Wyden argued that the government should not abandon the legislation. It is an important protection for online forums and, by extension, the First Amendment, he said.

“I can tell you that Americans don’t want to be at the mercy of speech police online or anywhere else,” he added.

It is unclear how Trump’s Executive Order will hold up, although Twitter is likely to take legal action in response.

Continue Reading

FCC

INCOMPAS Predicts Prompt Action on Net Neutrality

Liana Sowa

Published

on

Screenshot from the webinar

June 3, 2020 — The actions that President Donald Trump has taken to punish tech companies for alleged anti-conservative discrimination are radical, said Section 230 co-author Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., in an Aspen Institute webinar Tuesday.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects tech platforms from legal liability for non-criminal third party content on their websites. But Trump and several conservative critics have long argued that such protections are invalid when platforms begin playing an active role in content moderation.

When Twitter placed a warning label on one of Trump’s tweets last week, the president promised to make good on a longstanding threat to punish the platform.

Wyden said that the actions Trump is taking are an example of the president’s continued overreach in private business and lack of respect for the media.

“Donald Trump is waging an all-out war on the press, and pretty much anybody who seeks to hold him accountable, or actually disagrees with his lies, including on Twitter,” he said.

Section 230, Wyden explained, was intended to be a “sword and shield” to protect against small companies, organizations and movements against legal liability for what users post on their websites.

However, Wyden claimed that the statute’s interpretation had expanded beyond its original scope. Wyden said that he and his colleagues did not draft Section 230 with protections for big tech in mind and that he believes they are abusing their power in their data collection practices.

“I’ve got a lot of reservations about what big tech companies are doing today with respect to violating Americans’ privacy,” he said.

Although he is expressed discomfort with the ways interpretations of Section 230 have evolved, Wyden argued that the government should not abandon the legislation. It is an important protection for online forums and, by extension, the First Amendment, he said.

“I can tell you that Americans don’t want to be at the mercy of speech police online or anywhere else,” he added.

It is unclear how Trump’s Executive Order will hold up, although Twitter is likely to take legal action in response.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending