June 17, 2020 — Conversations around the removal or revision of Section 230 are often fraught with treacherous implications for free speech online, said participants in a Wednesday Lincoln Network webinar.
Panelists discussed an NBC News report from Tuesday, which incorrectly claimed that Google’s ad company would ban conservative news website The Federalist from running ads on its website because of racist content in its comment section. A clarification from Google came later in the day.
“The Federalist was never demonetized,” Google tweeted. “We worked with them to address issues on their site related to the comments section. Our policies do not allow ads to run against dangerous or derogatory content, which includes comments on sites.”
However, Google Ads permanently banned the conservative financial blog Zero Hedge from running ads with its program, citing similarly racist content in its comment section.
Despite this, Carl Szabo, Vice President and General Counsel at NetChoice, said that ad companies should not cater their policies to the specific industries of their users.
“What I raise concern with and what causes a breach of trust is when certain groups try to ask for special treatment,” he said. “That’s what you’re seeing in the media right now, is certain groups asking Google to treat them differently because they happen to engage in political content.”
Is discrimination against conservatives on tech platforms exaggerated?
Other participants said that the concerns about discrimination against conservatives were over exaggerated.
“One of the challenges there is that the reason that perceptions exist is because of a concerted... campaign to make people hold that belief,” said Renee DiResta, Technical Research Manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory.
Despite this, Iggy Ventures CEO Rick Lane said that the monitoring of such content can lead to free speech issues if the websites have nowhere to go for advertisers.
The major Silicon Valley advertising companies have the power not only to demonetize, but also “to basically monetize,” he said. “But if revenue is your livelihood, and they’re able to cut you off, well, that raises some questions when there’s no other place to go.”
The panel also discussed the various implications of government compulsion to moderate the content of popular websites. Szabo said that while The Federalist incident was a “mountain out of a molehill, at the end of the day,” the sites themselves had an incentive to police content on their platforms.
“If I think that going on to a platform is a giant cesspool of trash stuff, I’m not going to go there,” he said. “So, there is the financial incentive by these platforms to engage in the content moderation.”
The participants said that whether or not the government repealed Section 230 had no bearing on free speech rights.
“The First Amendment, not Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, protects it,” Szabo said. “So there’s clearly a lot of misunderstanding about what Section 230 does.”
“And at the end of the day, if we want more stability, more good content on the internet and less bad stuff, we need to protect Section 230,” he added.
- Online Speech Has Harmful Effects on Both Individuals and Society, According to Mary Anne Franks
- Pandemic Has Created an Environment for Consumer Fraud, Say Congressional Leaders
- Breakfast Media Minute: July 10, 2020
- Metrics and Automation Can Improve Federal Cybersecurity Measures
- Federal Communications Commission Must Reconsider Ligado Offer, Says Former Commissioner
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber1 month ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Artificial Intelligence3 weeks ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Artificial Intelligence1 week ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Congress1 month ago
Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
Broadband Roundup1 week ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance
#broadbandlive3 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 – Federal Broadband Funds and Opportunity Zones
Expert Opinion1 month ago
Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
Education2 weeks ago
A Mix of Resources and Technologies Are Needed to Close the Homework Gap