Social Media
Social Media Companies Can Block and Control Harmful Content Amidst Current Coronavirus Disinformation

June 9, 2020 — Though disinformation is rampant online, there is still hope that social media companies can control it, said Ryan Calo, principal investigator at the Center for an Informed Public, in an interview on KUOW Public Radio Tuesday.
While social media platforms have recently seen vast amounts of false information about the coronavirus pandemic and national protests, social media companies like Facebook have been able to block similarly harmful content in the past, Calo said.
“You just don’t see online gambling advertisements the way you used to; you don’t see jihadi recruitment videos the way you used to,” he pointed out.
However, Calo claimed that companies must be placed under pressure in order for them to want to cut down on harmful content.
“What you see over time is that when a company is highly motivated to put an end to something…they’ve been really good at it,” he said.
Calo also argued for increased responsibility for those in positions of authority who knowingly share false or misleading material. If they recognize that the content they shared was misleading, he said, they should take steps to clarify and correct the mistake.
“The best practice is that they should come clean about it, and they should take a screenshot of it,” he said. “Delete the actual tweets so it can’t continue to propagate.”
Calo said that these measures are crucial in an age of uncertainty about social media platforms’ responsibility for misleading content on their websites.
These concerns reached a high point in late May when President Donald Trump tweeted that mail-in ballots will be “substantially fraudulent.”
“Mail boxes [sic] will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one,” he tweeted.
Twitter added warning labels to the tweets, saying that they were misleading and urging users to “Get the facts about mail-in ballots.”
In response, Trump signed an executive order attempting to roll back protections on Twitter and other platforms that choose to engage with content moderation.
However, Calo said that Twitter’s actions were not only constitutional but also part of the cost of opting into their service in the first place.
“The First Amendment limits what the government can do, not what Twitter can do as a private company,” he said. “…The President can’t stop them from commenting on what he’s saying.”
The interview can be viewed here.
Section 230
Crackdown on Online Conspiracy Speakers After January 6 Highlights Need for Platform Accountability

June 9, 2020 — Though disinformation is rampant online, there is still hope that social media companies can control it, said Ryan Calo, principal investigator at the Center for an Informed Public, in an interview on KUOW Public Radio Tuesday.
While social media platforms have recently seen vast amounts of false information about the coronavirus pandemic and national protests, social media companies like Facebook have been able to block similarly harmful content in the past, Calo said.
“You just don’t see online gambling advertisements the way you used to; you don’t see jihadi recruitment videos the way you used to,” he pointed out.
However, Calo claimed that companies must be placed under pressure in order for them to want to cut down on harmful content.
“What you see over time is that when a company is highly motivated to put an end to something…they’ve been really good at it,” he said.
Calo also argued for increased responsibility for those in positions of authority who knowingly share false or misleading material. If they recognize that the content they shared was misleading, he said, they should take steps to clarify and correct the mistake.
“The best practice is that they should come clean about it, and they should take a screenshot of it,” he said. “Delete the actual tweets so it can’t continue to propagate.”
Calo said that these measures are crucial in an age of uncertainty about social media platforms’ responsibility for misleading content on their websites.
These concerns reached a high point in late May when President Donald Trump tweeted that mail-in ballots will be “substantially fraudulent.”
“Mail boxes [sic] will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one,” he tweeted.
Twitter added warning labels to the tweets, saying that they were misleading and urging users to “Get the facts about mail-in ballots.”
In response, Trump signed an executive order attempting to roll back protections on Twitter and other platforms that choose to engage with content moderation.
However, Calo said that Twitter’s actions were not only constitutional but also part of the cost of opting into their service in the first place.
“The First Amendment limits what the government can do, not what Twitter can do as a private company,” he said. “…The President can’t stop them from commenting on what he’s saying.”
The interview can be viewed here.
Social Media
Trump Blasts Big Tech and Takes No Responsibility For Inciting Deadly U.S. Capitol Insurrection

June 9, 2020 — Though disinformation is rampant online, there is still hope that social media companies can control it, said Ryan Calo, principal investigator at the Center for an Informed Public, in an interview on KUOW Public Radio Tuesday.
While social media platforms have recently seen vast amounts of false information about the coronavirus pandemic and national protests, social media companies like Facebook have been able to block similarly harmful content in the past, Calo said.
“You just don’t see online gambling advertisements the way you used to; you don’t see jihadi recruitment videos the way you used to,” he pointed out.
However, Calo claimed that companies must be placed under pressure in order for them to want to cut down on harmful content.
“What you see over time is that when a company is highly motivated to put an end to something…they’ve been really good at it,” he said.
Calo also argued for increased responsibility for those in positions of authority who knowingly share false or misleading material. If they recognize that the content they shared was misleading, he said, they should take steps to clarify and correct the mistake.
“The best practice is that they should come clean about it, and they should take a screenshot of it,” he said. “Delete the actual tweets so it can’t continue to propagate.”
Calo said that these measures are crucial in an age of uncertainty about social media platforms’ responsibility for misleading content on their websites.
These concerns reached a high point in late May when President Donald Trump tweeted that mail-in ballots will be “substantially fraudulent.”
“Mail boxes [sic] will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one,” he tweeted.
Twitter added warning labels to the tweets, saying that they were misleading and urging users to “Get the facts about mail-in ballots.”
In response, Trump signed an executive order attempting to roll back protections on Twitter and other platforms that choose to engage with content moderation.
However, Calo said that Twitter’s actions were not only constitutional but also part of the cost of opting into their service in the first place.
“The First Amendment limits what the government can do, not what Twitter can do as a private company,” he said. “…The President can’t stop them from commenting on what he’s saying.”
The interview can be viewed here.
#broadbandlive
Special Broadband Breakfast Live Online Town Hall on Section 230 on Wednesday, January 13, 2021

June 9, 2020 — Though disinformation is rampant online, there is still hope that social media companies can control it, said Ryan Calo, principal investigator at the Center for an Informed Public, in an interview on KUOW Public Radio Tuesday.
While social media platforms have recently seen vast amounts of false information about the coronavirus pandemic and national protests, social media companies like Facebook have been able to block similarly harmful content in the past, Calo said.
“You just don’t see online gambling advertisements the way you used to; you don’t see jihadi recruitment videos the way you used to,” he pointed out.
However, Calo claimed that companies must be placed under pressure in order for them to want to cut down on harmful content.
“What you see over time is that when a company is highly motivated to put an end to something…they’ve been really good at it,” he said.
Calo also argued for increased responsibility for those in positions of authority who knowingly share false or misleading material. If they recognize that the content they shared was misleading, he said, they should take steps to clarify and correct the mistake.
“The best practice is that they should come clean about it, and they should take a screenshot of it,” he said. “Delete the actual tweets so it can’t continue to propagate.”
Calo said that these measures are crucial in an age of uncertainty about social media platforms’ responsibility for misleading content on their websites.
These concerns reached a high point in late May when President Donald Trump tweeted that mail-in ballots will be “substantially fraudulent.”
“Mail boxes [sic] will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one,” he tweeted.
Twitter added warning labels to the tweets, saying that they were misleading and urging users to “Get the facts about mail-in ballots.”
In response, Trump signed an executive order attempting to roll back protections on Twitter and other platforms that choose to engage with content moderation.
However, Calo said that Twitter’s actions were not only constitutional but also part of the cost of opting into their service in the first place.
“The First Amendment limits what the government can do, not what Twitter can do as a private company,” he said. “…The President can’t stop them from commenting on what he’s saying.”
The interview can be viewed here.
-
Artificial Intelligence1 month ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Broadband Roundup2 months ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
Section 2302 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
#broadbandlive3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, November 18, 2020 — Case Studies of Transformative 5G Apps in the Enterprise
-
Artificial Intelligence6 days ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G2 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
#broadbandlive4 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, September 30, 2020 — Champions of Broadband: Sunne McPeak