Antitrust
Recent Supreme Court Decision Likely to Help Big Tech if Charged With Antitrust Violations

October 12, 2020 – Because the network effects of digital platforms makes it hard to prove harm to consumers, it is difficult to rein in the monopoly power of big tech companies.
That was the message at Georgetown Law Center event on Tuesday included as part of the 14th Annual Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium.
“Determining which transactions are pro-competitive and which are anti-competitive is not so easy,” said Fiona Morton, professor of economics at Yale University.
Network effects mean that as the total number of users on the platform increase, benefits to users rise. And that makes it hard to prove the consumer harm that is required for traditional antitrust analysis.
Panelists detailed the impact that the 2018 Supreme Court ruling in Ohio v. American Express Co. has had upon the future of competition law for multi-sided digital platforms.
In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that American Express did not break federal laws by prohibiting merchants from steering consumers to alternative payment methods, which is central to the AmEx business model.
AmEx defended its practice by arguing that the anti-steering policies benefited its cardholders, as the higher transaction fees help maintain member services.
While the Department of Justice and several states prevailed during a district court trial in 2015 because it harmed merchants, the appeals court reversed. It ruled that plaintiffs had not shown harm to both sides of the two-sided market.
The Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision affirming the appeals court.
In upholding the appeals court’s decision, the Supreme Court gave a powerful antitrust defense to the big tech planforms for the frequent situation in which two-sided and multi-sided markets are deployed.
Antitrust
Google Hit With Third Antitrust Lawsuit, This One by Both Democratic and Republican Attorneys General

October 12, 2020 – Because the network effects of digital platforms makes it hard to prove harm to consumers, it is difficult to rein in the monopoly power of big tech companies.
That was the message at Georgetown Law Center event on Tuesday included as part of the 14th Annual Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium.
“Determining which transactions are pro-competitive and which are anti-competitive is not so easy,” said Fiona Morton, professor of economics at Yale University.
Network effects mean that as the total number of users on the platform increase, benefits to users rise. And that makes it hard to prove the consumer harm that is required for traditional antitrust analysis.
Panelists detailed the impact that the 2018 Supreme Court ruling in Ohio v. American Express Co. has had upon the future of competition law for multi-sided digital platforms.
In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that American Express did not break federal laws by prohibiting merchants from steering consumers to alternative payment methods, which is central to the AmEx business model.
AmEx defended its practice by arguing that the anti-steering policies benefited its cardholders, as the higher transaction fees help maintain member services.
While the Department of Justice and several states prevailed during a district court trial in 2015 because it harmed merchants, the appeals court reversed. It ruled that plaintiffs had not shown harm to both sides of the two-sided market.
The Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision affirming the appeals court.
In upholding the appeals court’s decision, the Supreme Court gave a powerful antitrust defense to the big tech planforms for the frequent situation in which two-sided and multi-sided markets are deployed.
Antitrust
FTC and Almost All States Launch Antitrust Suit Against Facebook, Seek Divestment of Instagram and WhatsApp

October 12, 2020 – Because the network effects of digital platforms makes it hard to prove harm to consumers, it is difficult to rein in the monopoly power of big tech companies.
That was the message at Georgetown Law Center event on Tuesday included as part of the 14th Annual Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium.
“Determining which transactions are pro-competitive and which are anti-competitive is not so easy,” said Fiona Morton, professor of economics at Yale University.
Network effects mean that as the total number of users on the platform increase, benefits to users rise. And that makes it hard to prove the consumer harm that is required for traditional antitrust analysis.
Panelists detailed the impact that the 2018 Supreme Court ruling in Ohio v. American Express Co. has had upon the future of competition law for multi-sided digital platforms.
In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that American Express did not break federal laws by prohibiting merchants from steering consumers to alternative payment methods, which is central to the AmEx business model.
AmEx defended its practice by arguing that the anti-steering policies benefited its cardholders, as the higher transaction fees help maintain member services.
While the Department of Justice and several states prevailed during a district court trial in 2015 because it harmed merchants, the appeals court reversed. It ruled that plaintiffs had not shown harm to both sides of the two-sided market.
The Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision affirming the appeals court.
In upholding the appeals court’s decision, the Supreme Court gave a powerful antitrust defense to the big tech planforms for the frequent situation in which two-sided and multi-sided markets are deployed.
Antitrust
Biden Administration Should Take a Trial-and-Error Approach to Antitrust, Say Brookings Panelists

October 12, 2020 – Because the network effects of digital platforms makes it hard to prove harm to consumers, it is difficult to rein in the monopoly power of big tech companies.
That was the message at Georgetown Law Center event on Tuesday included as part of the 14th Annual Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium.
“Determining which transactions are pro-competitive and which are anti-competitive is not so easy,” said Fiona Morton, professor of economics at Yale University.
Network effects mean that as the total number of users on the platform increase, benefits to users rise. And that makes it hard to prove the consumer harm that is required for traditional antitrust analysis.
Panelists detailed the impact that the 2018 Supreme Court ruling in Ohio v. American Express Co. has had upon the future of competition law for multi-sided digital platforms.
In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that American Express did not break federal laws by prohibiting merchants from steering consumers to alternative payment methods, which is central to the AmEx business model.
AmEx defended its practice by arguing that the anti-steering policies benefited its cardholders, as the higher transaction fees help maintain member services.
While the Department of Justice and several states prevailed during a district court trial in 2015 because it harmed merchants, the appeals court reversed. It ruled that plaintiffs had not shown harm to both sides of the two-sided market.
The Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision affirming the appeals court.
In upholding the appeals court’s decision, the Supreme Court gave a powerful antitrust defense to the big tech planforms for the frequent situation in which two-sided and multi-sided markets are deployed.
-
Artificial Intelligence1 month ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Section 2302 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
#broadbandlive3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, November 18, 2020 — Case Studies of Transformative 5G Apps in the Enterprise
-
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G2 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
#broadbandlive4 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, September 30, 2020 — Champions of Broadband: Sunne McPeak
-
5G4 months ago
Top Executives From Dell, Dish Networks and T-Mobile Tout Details of Their Companies’ 5G Deployments