Connect with us

Broadband's Impact

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Dings Microsoft's Efforts to Disrupt Google-Yahoo

WASHINGTON, July 15 – After testifying Tuesday morning about their internet advertising agreement in the Senate, Google and Yahoo executives trekked to the other side of the capitol to address concerns of the House Judiciary Committee in the afternoon.

Avatar

Published

on

WASHINGTON, July 15 – After testifying Tuesday morning about their internet advertising agreement in the Senate, Google and Yahoo executives trekked to the other side of the capitol to address concerns of the House Judiciary Committee in the afternoon.

Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., said that the committee’s Task Force on Competition Policy and Antitrust Laws was concerned about competition on the Internet – but he was concerned about the prospect that Microsoft might seek to acquire Yahoo.

Addressing a June 12 agreement between Google and Yahoo, in which the top two online search companies announced a collaboration on a range of technologies, Yahoo General Counsel Michael Callahan said it is an opportunity to accelerate competition. The deal is “good for consumers, good for advertisers, and yes, good for Yahoo,” he said.

The strictly commercial arrangement is one in which the “two companies … will remain autonomous and compete aggressively – in search and display advertising, mobile, news, e-mail, finance – you name it,” said Callahan.

Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond said that there should be no worries, for Yahoo, that the marketplace is competitive, robust and dynamic.

Further, web site operators will have “better ad matching technology, potentially increasing the revenue they earn from their site,” said Drummond. Advertisers will have better ad matching capability, “giving them improved ways to reach online customers more efficiently.”

Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith critize the agreement. Testifying over in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Smith recounted that Yahoo founder Jerry Yang said that if Yahoo and Google agreed to merge, competition in the search engine industry would cease.

But on the House side, Smith was forced to acknowledge the irony in Microsoft – a convicted antitrust law-breaker – pushing for government intervention to stop the deal.

Smith claimed that the Google-Yahoo agreement “will result in higher prices for advertisers and content creators.”

Another pro-Google-Yahoo voice was Tim Carter, CEO of www.askthebuilder.com. “The agreement between Google and Yahoo, as seen from my eyes as a consumer and an internet publisher, is actually a very good idea,” he said.

Education

Facebook and Utah Valley University Fund Tech Training Program for Utah Elementary Schools

Derek Shumway

Published

on

Photo of a Forbes Elementary School student courtesy UVU

WASHINGTON, July 15 – After testifying Tuesday morning about their internet advertising agreement in the Senate, Google and Yahoo executives trekked to the other side of the capitol to address concerns of the House Judiciary Committee in the afternoon.

Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., said that the committee’s Task Force on Competition Policy and Antitrust Laws was concerned about competition on the Internet – but he was concerned about the prospect that Microsoft might seek to acquire Yahoo.

Addressing a June 12 agreement between Google and Yahoo, in which the top two online search companies announced a collaboration on a range of technologies, Yahoo General Counsel Michael Callahan said it is an opportunity to accelerate competition. The deal is “good for consumers, good for advertisers, and yes, good for Yahoo,” he said.

The strictly commercial arrangement is one in which the “two companies … will remain autonomous and compete aggressively – in search and display advertising, mobile, news, e-mail, finance – you name it,” said Callahan.

Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond said that there should be no worries, for Yahoo, that the marketplace is competitive, robust and dynamic.

Further, web site operators will have “better ad matching technology, potentially increasing the revenue they earn from their site,” said Drummond. Advertisers will have better ad matching capability, “giving them improved ways to reach online customers more efficiently.”

Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith critize the agreement. Testifying over in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Smith recounted that Yahoo founder Jerry Yang said that if Yahoo and Google agreed to merge, competition in the search engine industry would cease.

But on the House side, Smith was forced to acknowledge the irony in Microsoft – a convicted antitrust law-breaker – pushing for government intervention to stop the deal.

Smith claimed that the Google-Yahoo agreement “will result in higher prices for advertisers and content creators.”

Another pro-Google-Yahoo voice was Tim Carter, CEO of www.askthebuilder.com. “The agreement between Google and Yahoo, as seen from my eyes as a consumer and an internet publisher, is actually a very good idea,” he said.

Continue Reading

Health

Healthcare Startup, Boosted By Pandemic, Wants To Alleviate Fears Before And After Surgery

PatientPartner, which helps surgery patients connect with each other, is seeing rapid growth during the pandemic.

Derek Shumway

Published

on

PatientPartner founders George Kramb and Patrick Frank

WASHINGTON, July 15 – After testifying Tuesday morning about their internet advertising agreement in the Senate, Google and Yahoo executives trekked to the other side of the capitol to address concerns of the House Judiciary Committee in the afternoon.

Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., said that the committee’s Task Force on Competition Policy and Antitrust Laws was concerned about competition on the Internet – but he was concerned about the prospect that Microsoft might seek to acquire Yahoo.

Addressing a June 12 agreement between Google and Yahoo, in which the top two online search companies announced a collaboration on a range of technologies, Yahoo General Counsel Michael Callahan said it is an opportunity to accelerate competition. The deal is “good for consumers, good for advertisers, and yes, good for Yahoo,” he said.

The strictly commercial arrangement is one in which the “two companies … will remain autonomous and compete aggressively – in search and display advertising, mobile, news, e-mail, finance – you name it,” said Callahan.

Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond said that there should be no worries, for Yahoo, that the marketplace is competitive, robust and dynamic.

Further, web site operators will have “better ad matching technology, potentially increasing the revenue they earn from their site,” said Drummond. Advertisers will have better ad matching capability, “giving them improved ways to reach online customers more efficiently.”

Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith critize the agreement. Testifying over in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Smith recounted that Yahoo founder Jerry Yang said that if Yahoo and Google agreed to merge, competition in the search engine industry would cease.

But on the House side, Smith was forced to acknowledge the irony in Microsoft – a convicted antitrust law-breaker – pushing for government intervention to stop the deal.

Smith claimed that the Google-Yahoo agreement “will result in higher prices for advertisers and content creators.”

Another pro-Google-Yahoo voice was Tim Carter, CEO of www.askthebuilder.com. “The agreement between Google and Yahoo, as seen from my eyes as a consumer and an internet publisher, is actually a very good idea,” he said.

Continue Reading

Education

Surveying Broadband Issues Faced by Students Under COVID-19, CoSN Offers Its Recommendations

The speed of the broadband service used was only one component of the issues students faced.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

Photo of Keith Krueger, CEO of the Consortium of School Networking, from Millennium Sustainable Education

WASHINGTON, July 15 – After testifying Tuesday morning about their internet advertising agreement in the Senate, Google and Yahoo executives trekked to the other side of the capitol to address concerns of the House Judiciary Committee in the afternoon.

Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., said that the committee’s Task Force on Competition Policy and Antitrust Laws was concerned about competition on the Internet – but he was concerned about the prospect that Microsoft might seek to acquire Yahoo.

Addressing a June 12 agreement between Google and Yahoo, in which the top two online search companies announced a collaboration on a range of technologies, Yahoo General Counsel Michael Callahan said it is an opportunity to accelerate competition. The deal is “good for consumers, good for advertisers, and yes, good for Yahoo,” he said.

The strictly commercial arrangement is one in which the “two companies … will remain autonomous and compete aggressively – in search and display advertising, mobile, news, e-mail, finance – you name it,” said Callahan.

Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond said that there should be no worries, for Yahoo, that the marketplace is competitive, robust and dynamic.

Further, web site operators will have “better ad matching technology, potentially increasing the revenue they earn from their site,” said Drummond. Advertisers will have better ad matching capability, “giving them improved ways to reach online customers more efficiently.”

Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith critize the agreement. Testifying over in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Smith recounted that Yahoo founder Jerry Yang said that if Yahoo and Google agreed to merge, competition in the search engine industry would cease.

But on the House side, Smith was forced to acknowledge the irony in Microsoft – a convicted antitrust law-breaker – pushing for government intervention to stop the deal.

Smith claimed that the Google-Yahoo agreement “will result in higher prices for advertisers and content creators.”

Another pro-Google-Yahoo voice was Tim Carter, CEO of www.askthebuilder.com. “The agreement between Google and Yahoo, as seen from my eyes as a consumer and an internet publisher, is actually a very good idea,” he said.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending