Connect with us

Broadband Data

'Beer and Broadband Mapping' at the Top Telecommunications Policy Conference

ARLINGTON, Va., September 28, 2009 – “Beer and Broadband Mapping” was the informal name appended to a spirited and lively discussion that capped the first day of the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference here at George Mason School of Law on Friday, September 25.

Published

on

ARLINGTON, Va., September 28, 2009 – “Beer and Broadband Mapping” was the informal name appended to a spirited and lively discussion that capped the first day of the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference here at George Mason School of Law on Friday, September 25.

Blair Levin, executive director of the Federal Communication Commission’s Omnibus Broadband Initiative and a keynote panelist at the Friday evening event, joked that the real intelligence among those academics would be among those spending their Friday night talking about broadband data.

The discussion, which was sponsored by The Benton Foundation, BroadbandCensus.com and the New America Foundation, began at around 8:30 p.m., and lasted for nearly an hour and a half. Many notable academics from TPRC, and from the Obama administration, attended the session.

Charles Benton, chairman of the Benton Foundation, began the discussion by noting the importance of broadband data disclosure, which he had emphasized in his opening statement at the U.S. Broadband Coalition on Thursday, September 24.

Drew Clark, executive director of BroadbandCensus.com, followed by presenting the company’s public and transparent map of Columbia, South Carolina, that shows broadband speeds, technologies, and providers It is available at BroadbandCensusMaps.com. Clark referenced the major change in policy on August 7, calling for disclosure of carrier data, under the Notice of Funds Availability, at the Census block level. He also talked about the importance of data including actual speeds versus advertised speeds, and pointed out that actual speed data was not a requirement of the NoFA. Unfortunately, he noted, pricing data is also not required under the NoFA.

Michael Calabrese, vice president and director of the Wireless Future Program at the New America Foundation, began his opening remarks by stating that the Recovery Act and the Broadband Data Improvement Act set aside up to $350 million for state mapping data. There is much more data out there for researchers and policy makers to layer over the inventory data, but only if they had the proper funding. Examples include actual household speeds and data on connection reliability.

Because the language in the act is vague and requires the “mapping of broadband capability,” the money that does not go to the states for the collection of data should be distributed to the academic community for more in-depth and layered collection efforts, Calabrese said. An inventory of the public sector fiber that is currently available is one of the possibilities under this broad “capabilities” language. Academics and other organizations need to ask about what type of data they need – above and beyond the existing FCC Form 477 – in order to create a complete the national broadband plan.

Before opening up the discussion, Clark, Benton and Calabrese reminded the crowd that there was no agenda behind the discussion, and that everyone should feel free to put their ideas and thoughts on the table. The following are some notes from the discussion.

The first couple of questions revolved around the carriers’ identities and whether there were any trade secrets, or whether the release of carrier data at the census block data would create any confidentiality concerns. Everyone agreed on the need for real connection speeds, as opposed to advertised speeds.

Others also wanted to find out if there was a transparent http cache, DNS manipulation, subtle traffic manipulation, jitter, and packet loss. The real question for the panel was: what data is truly necessary?

BroadbandCensus.com has been working along with the New America Foundation’s Measurement Lab to collect specific consumer data. Through the NDT tests deployed by both organizations, they have been able to gather valuable information from consumers, but are still trying to link that data with specific locations and the carriers themselves.

Other attendees asked: how important is true pricing data? How does bundling affect the ability to obtain real prices? Prices also seem to change depending on household credit history and other similar factors, not just geographical community.

The members at the meeting were also interested in the state of broadband competition. They wanted to be able to combine usage and availability to see if competition works. There should be a national broadband data warehouse that includes data collected from the federal government, data from independent sources and crowd sourcing, several individuals said. This warehouse, however, brought up a concern about the coherence and standardization between data types. Data from different sources need to be comparable in order to be properly analyzed.

More data must also be collected on the demand side. What are the different barriers to adoption? A largely overlooked factor regarding the lack of adoption was the low level of computer ownership. It would also be helpful to know which organizations are addressing the demand-side issues, and how effective have they been? Furthermore, in order to address the issues of uptake and how the community has benefited from broadband, researchers must look beyond household data. If there were an interest in what productivity advances deployment of technology has created, there needs to be a survey of the business districts in the cities being served.

Finally, everyone decided that they want to hear more positive stories. One way to do this is time-series data collection. Specific dates will make it easy to track change and see the progress of the areas that have been underserved and unserved. Where has there been success and what can be learned about those areas?

The meeting ended on a high note where all constituents agreed that there needs to be joint action and collaboration to make sure that the government is collecting the correct data in order to come up with a complete national broadband strategy.

About BroadbandCensus.com

BroadbandCensus.com was launched in January 2008, and uses “crowdsourcing” to collect the Broadband SPARC: Speeds, Prices, Availability, Reliability and Competition. The news on BroadbandCensus.com is produced by Broadband Census News LLC, a subsidiary of Broadband Census LLC that was created in July 2009.

A recent split of operations helps to clarify the mission of BroadbandCensus.com. Broadband Census Data LLC offers commercial broadband verification services to cities, states, carriers and broadband users. Created in July 2009, Broadband Census Data LLC produced a joint application in the NTIA’s Broadband Technology Opportunities Program with Virginia Tech’s eCorridors Program. In August 2009, BroadbandCensus.com released a beta map of Columbia, South Carolina, in partnership with Benedict-Allen Community Development Corporation.

Broadband Census News LLC offers daily and weekly reporting, as well as the Broadband Breakfast Club. The Broadband Breakfast Club has been inviting top experts and policy-makers to share breakfast and perspectives on broadband technology and internet policy since October 2008. Both Broadband Census News LLC and Broadband Census Data LLC are subsidiaries of Broadband Census LLC, and are organized in the Commonwealth of Virginia. About BroadbandCensus.com.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Broadband Data

Ookla Has Verizon as Fastest Q1 Fixed Provider, T-Mobile Takes Top Spot for Mobile

T-Mobile was also named the most consistent mobile operator and topped 5G download speeds.

Published

on

Image of Speedtest from May 2017 by Daniel Aleksandersen used with permission

WASHINGTON, April 18, 2022 – A market report released Friday by performance metrics web service Ookla named Verizon the fastest fixed broadband provider in the U.S. during the first quarter of 2022, and T-Mobile as the fastest mobile operator during the same period.

Verizon had a median download speed of 184.36 Mbps, edging out Comcast Xfinity’s speed of 179.12 Mbps. T-Mobile’s median mobile speed was 117.83 Mbps.

Verizon had the lowest latency of all providers, according to Ookla, well ahead of Xfinity’s fourth place ranking, yet sat at third for consistency behind both Xfinity and Spectrum.

T-Mobile was also the most consistent mobile operator during the first quarter, achieving an Ookla consistency score of 88.3 percent, which along with median download speed represented an increase from the fourth quarter of 2021.

The company also achieved the fastest median 5G download speed, coming in at 191.12 Mbps.

Verizon also notably increased its 5G download speed from its Q4 metric, attributed in part to the turning on of new C-band spectrum in January following deployment delays and protest from airlines. For mobile speeds, it stood in second behind T-Mobile, bumping AT&T to a standing of third. These rankings were the same for mobile measures of latency and consistency.

Yet on 5G availability, AT&T remains ahead of Verizon.

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra came in as the fastest popular device in the country, running at 116.33 Mbps.

Ookla is a sponsor of Broadband Breakfast.

Continue Reading

Broadband Data

FCC’s Rosenworcel: Broadband Nutrition Labels Will Create New Generation of Informed Buyers

The FCC hopes companies will make it easier for consumers to choose a broadband plan that fits their needs.

Published

on

Photo of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel speaking at the Mobile World Conference 2022 in Barcelona

WASHINGTON, March 11, 2022 – The Federal Communications Commission’s broadband nutrition labels will usher in a new era where buyers have simple information about what they’re buying, agency Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said Friday.

Consumers should know what they’re signing up for when they spend hundreds “or even thousands” of dollars per year for internet service. She was speaking at Friday’s commission hearing on its so-called broadband nutrition label initiative.

The hearing comes on top of a public comment period on the initiative. Many providers are pushing for more flexible regulations on compliance.

When consumers choose a broadband provider for their household, Rosenworcel said may people make decisions with “sometimes incomplete and inaccurate information.”

“The problem for broadband consumers isn’t a total lack of information, but there’s loads of fine print,” Rosenworcel said. “It can be difficult to know exactly what we are paying for and these disclosures are not consistent from carrier to carrier,” which makes comparing prices and services harder and more time-consuming for consumers.

The comments built on other recent speeches by Rosenworcel promoting the initiative, encouraging state attorneys general’s ability to enforce companies’ commitments through their states’ consumer protection statutes.

The FCC began a plan in 2015 for broadband labels that was voluntary. The new initiative directed by last year’s bipartisan infrastructure law makes this effort mandatory for broadband providers.

Matt Sayre, managing director of cross sector economic development firm Onward Eugene, said residents in rural Oregon would benefit from simple information when considering broadband providers. During a time where dial-up and satellite-based offerings were primarily available, Sayre said his neighbors “never used terms like latency or packet loss.”

“These are important aspects of good internet service, but not easily understood by most people,” Sayre said. “Citizens understood they needed better service but were uncertain about what tier of service they needed. This is where broadband labels can be very helpful.”

The hearing was the agency’s first on the initiative.

Continue Reading

Broadband Data

Small ISP Organizations Push FCC for Flexibility on Broadband Label Compliance

Advocates say strict compliance requirements may economically harm small providers.

Published

on

Photo of outgoing WISPA CEO of Claude Aiken from April 2018 by New America used with permission

WASHINGTON, March 11, 2022 ­­– In comments submitted to the Federal Communications Commission Wednesday, organizations representing small internet providers are pushing for flexible regulations on compliance with a measure that requires clear reporting of broadband service aspects to consumers.

The measure was adopted at a late January meeting by the commission, mandating that providers list their pricing and speed information about services in the format of a “broadband nutrition label” that mimics a food nutrition label. Congress’ bipartisan infrastructure bill enacted in the fall required that the FCC adopt such policy.

The organizations that submitted comments Wednesday say that strict compliance requirements for the new measure may economically harm small providers.

Among those leading the charge are trade associations Wireless Internet Service Providers Association, NTCA – The Rural Broadband Association and America’s Communications Association as well as provider Lumen Technologies.

In comments, limited resources of smaller providers were cited as factors which could disadvantage them in terms of complying with the measure to the FCC’s standards and several organizations asked for small providers to be given extra time to comply.

In separate comments, internet provider Lumen said that the FCC must make multiple changes to its approach if it is to “avoid imposing new obligations that arbitrarily impose excessive costs on providers and undermine other policy goals.”

Last month, FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said that she looks forward to increased coordination between the FCC and state attorneys general for the enforcement of the measure.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending