Connect with us

FCC

Wireless Industry Official, Consumer Advocate Face Off On Net Neutrality

WASHINGTON, December 15, 2009 – A representative from a wireless industry focused trade association and a co-founder of a consumer advocate group faced off Tuesday on the heated topic about whether the Federal Communications Commission should regulate Internet access to support Net neutrality or open Internet principles.

Avatar

Published

on

WASHINGTON, December 15, 2009 – A representative from a wireless industry focused trade association and a co-founder of a consumer advocate group faced off Tuesday on the heated topic about whether the Federal Communications Commission should regulate Internet access to support Net neutrality or open Internet principles.

CTIA-The Wireless Association Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Chris Guttman-McCabe and Public Knowledge’s President & Co-founder Gigi Sohn said they agree Internet service providers should be transparent, provide disclosure to consumers and other companies as to how they are running their businesses, and they should have the ability to manage their networks reasonably.

However, the agreement ended there. Guttman-McCabe said the FCC hasn’t made a good case for why the proposed regulations should exist. He warned of more harm and unintended consequences while currently so much is going right in the internet space.

Sohn, on the other hand, argued that the last four years of “no mans land,” or no official regulation on Net neutrality principles, “hasn’t benefited anyone” but added that the Internet is currently “working really well.” Sohn doesn’t think ISPs should be able to pick winners and losers. According to Sohn, the proposed Net neutrality rules are “very narrow.”

“As I said in the debate, if these rules are enacted, their impact would go well beyond what the FCC has envisioned – fundamentally changing the wireless industry in a negative way,” Guttman-McCabe said following the debate.

CTIA argues that the FCC “should recognize the unique aspects of wireless that militate against applying wireline net neutrality rules to a wireless world. Without the ability to adapt, evolve, and respond to the changing wireless environment through reasonable network management, a consumer’s intensive network use can harm all other users in the vicinity.”

“Wireless carriers actively manage their networks to both ensure the highest-quality Internet experience for all consumers – not only the few who demand inordinate amounts of bandwidth and capacity – and to ensure that services that are time-sensitive are given the resources to function properly,” said CTIA in a statement. CTIA warns that the regulation of one area — such as broadband Internet access providers — will impact all parts of the “interdependent wireless ecosystem.”

Sohn said she is concerned that the FCC’s current definition of reasonable network management is too “loose goosey.” She doesn’t want large wireless carriers to be able to prioritize data. Sohn said “the question is no longer whether we will have Net neutrality regulation” but how it can be done right in a way that protects consumers.

Winter covered technology policy issues for five-and-a-half years as a reporter for the National Journal Group. She has worked for USA Today, the Washington Times, the Magazine Group, the State Department’s International Visitor’s Program, and the Council on Hemispheric Affairs. She also taught English at a university in Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

Education

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel Unveils Proposed Rules for Emergency Connectivity Fund

Acting FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel on Friday released rules for the Emergency Connectivity Fund, answering many questions about the program.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

Photo of Jessica Rosenworcel from the FCC

WASHINGTON, December 15, 2009 – A representative from a wireless industry focused trade association and a co-founder of a consumer advocate group faced off Tuesday on the heated topic about whether the Federal Communications Commission should regulate Internet access to support Net neutrality or open Internet principles.

CTIA-The Wireless Association Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Chris Guttman-McCabe and Public Knowledge’s President & Co-founder Gigi Sohn said they agree Internet service providers should be transparent, provide disclosure to consumers and other companies as to how they are running their businesses, and they should have the ability to manage their networks reasonably.

However, the agreement ended there. Guttman-McCabe said the FCC hasn’t made a good case for why the proposed regulations should exist. He warned of more harm and unintended consequences while currently so much is going right in the internet space.

Sohn, on the other hand, argued that the last four years of “no mans land,” or no official regulation on Net neutrality principles, “hasn’t benefited anyone” but added that the Internet is currently “working really well.” Sohn doesn’t think ISPs should be able to pick winners and losers. According to Sohn, the proposed Net neutrality rules are “very narrow.”

“As I said in the debate, if these rules are enacted, their impact would go well beyond what the FCC has envisioned – fundamentally changing the wireless industry in a negative way,” Guttman-McCabe said following the debate.

CTIA argues that the FCC “should recognize the unique aspects of wireless that militate against applying wireline net neutrality rules to a wireless world. Without the ability to adapt, evolve, and respond to the changing wireless environment through reasonable network management, a consumer’s intensive network use can harm all other users in the vicinity.”

“Wireless carriers actively manage their networks to both ensure the highest-quality Internet experience for all consumers – not only the few who demand inordinate amounts of bandwidth and capacity – and to ensure that services that are time-sensitive are given the resources to function properly,” said CTIA in a statement. CTIA warns that the regulation of one area — such as broadband Internet access providers — will impact all parts of the “interdependent wireless ecosystem.”

Sohn said she is concerned that the FCC’s current definition of reasonable network management is too “loose goosey.” She doesn’t want large wireless carriers to be able to prioritize data. Sohn said “the question is no longer whether we will have Net neutrality regulation” but how it can be done right in a way that protects consumers.

Continue Reading

FCC

Rosenworcel Says Anti-Muni Network Legislation Unfair, Hopes States Change Their Tune

FCC acting chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said she hopes state legislatures change stance on muni builds.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

WASHINGTON, December 15, 2009 – A representative from a wireless industry focused trade association and a co-founder of a consumer advocate group faced off Tuesday on the heated topic about whether the Federal Communications Commission should regulate Internet access to support Net neutrality or open Internet principles.

CTIA-The Wireless Association Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Chris Guttman-McCabe and Public Knowledge’s President & Co-founder Gigi Sohn said they agree Internet service providers should be transparent, provide disclosure to consumers and other companies as to how they are running their businesses, and they should have the ability to manage their networks reasonably.

However, the agreement ended there. Guttman-McCabe said the FCC hasn’t made a good case for why the proposed regulations should exist. He warned of more harm and unintended consequences while currently so much is going right in the internet space.

Sohn, on the other hand, argued that the last four years of “no mans land,” or no official regulation on Net neutrality principles, “hasn’t benefited anyone” but added that the Internet is currently “working really well.” Sohn doesn’t think ISPs should be able to pick winners and losers. According to Sohn, the proposed Net neutrality rules are “very narrow.”

“As I said in the debate, if these rules are enacted, their impact would go well beyond what the FCC has envisioned – fundamentally changing the wireless industry in a negative way,” Guttman-McCabe said following the debate.

CTIA argues that the FCC “should recognize the unique aspects of wireless that militate against applying wireline net neutrality rules to a wireless world. Without the ability to adapt, evolve, and respond to the changing wireless environment through reasonable network management, a consumer’s intensive network use can harm all other users in the vicinity.”

“Wireless carriers actively manage their networks to both ensure the highest-quality Internet experience for all consumers – not only the few who demand inordinate amounts of bandwidth and capacity – and to ensure that services that are time-sensitive are given the resources to function properly,” said CTIA in a statement. CTIA warns that the regulation of one area — such as broadband Internet access providers — will impact all parts of the “interdependent wireless ecosystem.”

Sohn said she is concerned that the FCC’s current definition of reasonable network management is too “loose goosey.” She doesn’t want large wireless carriers to be able to prioritize data. Sohn said “the question is no longer whether we will have Net neutrality regulation” but how it can be done right in a way that protects consumers.

Continue Reading

Broadband's Impact

FCC Fines Company $4.1 Million for Slamming and Cramming Consumer Phone Lines

The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday fined Tele Circuit Network Corporation for switching consumers’ service providers.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

Photo of Geoffrey Starks by Amelia Holowaty Krales of the Verge

WASHINGTON, December 15, 2009 – A representative from a wireless industry focused trade association and a co-founder of a consumer advocate group faced off Tuesday on the heated topic about whether the Federal Communications Commission should regulate Internet access to support Net neutrality or open Internet principles.

CTIA-The Wireless Association Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Chris Guttman-McCabe and Public Knowledge’s President & Co-founder Gigi Sohn said they agree Internet service providers should be transparent, provide disclosure to consumers and other companies as to how they are running their businesses, and they should have the ability to manage their networks reasonably.

However, the agreement ended there. Guttman-McCabe said the FCC hasn’t made a good case for why the proposed regulations should exist. He warned of more harm and unintended consequences while currently so much is going right in the internet space.

Sohn, on the other hand, argued that the last four years of “no mans land,” or no official regulation on Net neutrality principles, “hasn’t benefited anyone” but added that the Internet is currently “working really well.” Sohn doesn’t think ISPs should be able to pick winners and losers. According to Sohn, the proposed Net neutrality rules are “very narrow.”

“As I said in the debate, if these rules are enacted, their impact would go well beyond what the FCC has envisioned – fundamentally changing the wireless industry in a negative way,” Guttman-McCabe said following the debate.

CTIA argues that the FCC “should recognize the unique aspects of wireless that militate against applying wireline net neutrality rules to a wireless world. Without the ability to adapt, evolve, and respond to the changing wireless environment through reasonable network management, a consumer’s intensive network use can harm all other users in the vicinity.”

“Wireless carriers actively manage their networks to both ensure the highest-quality Internet experience for all consumers – not only the few who demand inordinate amounts of bandwidth and capacity – and to ensure that services that are time-sensitive are given the resources to function properly,” said CTIA in a statement. CTIA warns that the regulation of one area — such as broadband Internet access providers — will impact all parts of the “interdependent wireless ecosystem.”

Sohn said she is concerned that the FCC’s current definition of reasonable network management is too “loose goosey.” She doesn’t want large wireless carriers to be able to prioritize data. Sohn said “the question is no longer whether we will have Net neutrality regulation” but how it can be done right in a way that protects consumers.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending