Connect with us

Net Neutrality

Lawmakers Show Partisan Split on Open Internet Proposal

WASHINGTON, September 2, 2010 – The request for comments by the Federal Communications Commission on the managed services aspect on the open internet has received mixed reactions from members of Congress.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, September 2, 2010 – The request for comments by the Federal Communications Commission on the managed services and mobile broadband aspect on the open internet has received mixed reactions from members of Congress.

Republican Sen. John Ensign from Nevada would like to limit the power of the FCC. “Considering that net neutrality is the primary reason for the chairman’s misguided attempt to re-regulate the internet under heavy-handed monopoly rules, I hope he puts his reclassification plans on the shelf indefinitely. It would be a mistake for the FCC to go down the Title II rabbit hole when it doesn’t even fully understand where it wants to go on net neutrality,” he said. “Either way, the FCC should avoid taking a heavy-handed approach to the Internet that might stifle innovation and investment in broadband services.”

Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts responded with a statement in support of the chairman’s so-called “Third Way” proposal which would implement a mix of Title I and Title II regulation while maintaining a “light touch”. “If Congress fails to successfully legislate clarifications this month to the FCC’s authority. It is my hope that the FCC will move quickly to complete its “Third Way” proceeding in order to protect consumers, safeguard fair competition, and preserve the openness that has enabled the Internet to become the most successful communications and commercial medium in history.”

He also said any “fast lanes” would fundamentally be opposed to the open internet principles, adding that the digital divide would widen if mobile broadband would be excluded from the principles.

Rahul Gaitonde has been writing for BroadbandBreakfast.com since the fall of 2009, and in May of 2010 he became Deputy Editor. He was a fellow at George Mason University’s Long Term Governance Project, a researcher at the International Center for Applied Studies in Information Technology and worked at the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. He holds a Masters of Public Policy from George Mason University, where his research focused on the economic and social benefits of broadband expansion. He has written extensively about Universal Service Fund reform, the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program and the Broadband Data Improvement Act

Net Neutrality

Biden Signs Executive Order on Net Neutrality, Broadband Pricing Policy and Big Tech Merger Scrutiny

Executive order would kickoff new antitrust and net neutrality regulations.

Published

on

Photo of Joe Biden in July 2021 from the South China Morning Press

WASHINGTON, September 2, 2010 – The request for comments by the Federal Communications Commission on the managed services and mobile broadband aspect on the open internet has received mixed reactions from members of Congress.

Republican Sen. John Ensign from Nevada would like to limit the power of the FCC. “Considering that net neutrality is the primary reason for the chairman’s misguided attempt to re-regulate the internet under heavy-handed monopoly rules, I hope he puts his reclassification plans on the shelf indefinitely. It would be a mistake for the FCC to go down the Title II rabbit hole when it doesn’t even fully understand where it wants to go on net neutrality,” he said. “Either way, the FCC should avoid taking a heavy-handed approach to the Internet that might stifle innovation and investment in broadband services.”

Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts responded with a statement in support of the chairman’s so-called “Third Way” proposal which would implement a mix of Title I and Title II regulation while maintaining a “light touch”. “If Congress fails to successfully legislate clarifications this month to the FCC’s authority. It is my hope that the FCC will move quickly to complete its “Third Way” proceeding in order to protect consumers, safeguard fair competition, and preserve the openness that has enabled the Internet to become the most successful communications and commercial medium in history.”

He also said any “fast lanes” would fundamentally be opposed to the open internet principles, adding that the digital divide would widen if mobile broadband would be excluded from the principles.

Continue Reading

Net Neutrality

Explainer: On the Cusp of Sea Change, Broadband Breakfast Examines the Net Neutrality Debate

In the first in a series of explainers, Broadband Breakfast has hand-picked the debate on net neutrality to bring readers up-to-speed on its history and future.

Published

on

Tim Wu, who coined "net neutrality," was appointed by the Biden White House to the National Economic Council

WASHINGTON, September 2, 2010 – The request for comments by the Federal Communications Commission on the managed services and mobile broadband aspect on the open internet has received mixed reactions from members of Congress.

Republican Sen. John Ensign from Nevada would like to limit the power of the FCC. “Considering that net neutrality is the primary reason for the chairman’s misguided attempt to re-regulate the internet under heavy-handed monopoly rules, I hope he puts his reclassification plans on the shelf indefinitely. It would be a mistake for the FCC to go down the Title II rabbit hole when it doesn’t even fully understand where it wants to go on net neutrality,” he said. “Either way, the FCC should avoid taking a heavy-handed approach to the Internet that might stifle innovation and investment in broadband services.”

Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts responded with a statement in support of the chairman’s so-called “Third Way” proposal which would implement a mix of Title I and Title II regulation while maintaining a “light touch”. “If Congress fails to successfully legislate clarifications this month to the FCC’s authority. It is my hope that the FCC will move quickly to complete its “Third Way” proceeding in order to protect consumers, safeguard fair competition, and preserve the openness that has enabled the Internet to become the most successful communications and commercial medium in history.”

He also said any “fast lanes” would fundamentally be opposed to the open internet principles, adding that the digital divide would widen if mobile broadband would be excluded from the principles.

Continue Reading

Net Neutrality

For or Against, It’s Time To Consider Codifying Net Neutrality In Law, Panelists Say

Published

on

Photo of Morgan Reed from C-SPAN

WASHINGTON, September 2, 2010 – The request for comments by the Federal Communications Commission on the managed services and mobile broadband aspect on the open internet has received mixed reactions from members of Congress.

Republican Sen. John Ensign from Nevada would like to limit the power of the FCC. “Considering that net neutrality is the primary reason for the chairman’s misguided attempt to re-regulate the internet under heavy-handed monopoly rules, I hope he puts his reclassification plans on the shelf indefinitely. It would be a mistake for the FCC to go down the Title II rabbit hole when it doesn’t even fully understand where it wants to go on net neutrality,” he said. “Either way, the FCC should avoid taking a heavy-handed approach to the Internet that might stifle innovation and investment in broadband services.”

Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts responded with a statement in support of the chairman’s so-called “Third Way” proposal which would implement a mix of Title I and Title II regulation while maintaining a “light touch”. “If Congress fails to successfully legislate clarifications this month to the FCC’s authority. It is my hope that the FCC will move quickly to complete its “Third Way” proceeding in order to protect consumers, safeguard fair competition, and preserve the openness that has enabled the Internet to become the most successful communications and commercial medium in history.”

He also said any “fast lanes” would fundamentally be opposed to the open internet principles, adding that the digital divide would widen if mobile broadband would be excluded from the principles.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

 

Trending