Connect with us

Big Tech

Business Dispute Between N.Y. Cable Firm, Broadcaster Threatens To Cut Customers Off — Again

Cablevision customers may be cut off from watching baseball in upcoming days if a business dispute between the cable company and a local broadcaster isn’t resolved by midnight Friday.

Broadband Breakfast Staff

Published

on

WASHINGTON, October 15, 2010 – Cablevision customers may be cut off from watching baseball in upcoming days if a business dispute between the cable company and a local broadcaster isn’t resolved by midnight Friday.

The New York cable television company is once again fighting over the fees it must pay a broadcaster — in this case Fox — to provide the programming to its own customers.

Cable companies have been complaining that broadcasters have been holding them hostage and using high profile events such as this week-end’s baseball playoffs to jack up their fees.

Broadcasters, for their part, say that their programming is worth significantly more than what the cable companies are paying for it.

Earlier this year, Time Warner Cable reached an agreement with Belo Corp. over this issue of retransmission consent fees. The two companies agreed on undisclosed terms for Belo’s 12 stations around the country, as well as local news networks, according to a report in the trade magazine Broadcasting and Cable.

“This state of affairs is getting tiresome as these disputes grow more frequent,” said Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge’s president and co-founder, who was one of the petitioners for a rule-making at the FCC to address the issue earlier this year. “It is because of situations like this that Public Knowledge joined 13 other parties in March to ask the FCC to consider changing the rules governing the terms and conditions under which broadcast stations are carried on cable networks.”

The petition proposes that the broadcasters should continue to allow the cable companies to carry their signals even after the contracts between the two sides have expired as the two sides negotiate, among other things.

Cablevision, along with Time Warner Cable, and the American Cable Association were among the 13 petitioners.

For a review of the issues at stake, and what the companies’ lobbyists are arguing in policy circles in Washington, DC, readers can refer to the Intellectual Property Breakfast Club’s event video from this June.

Broadband Breakfast is a decade-old news organization based in Washington that is building a community of interest around broadband policy and internet technology, with a particular focus on better broadband infrastructure, the politics of privacy and the regulation of social media. Learn more about Broadband Breakfast.

Social Media

Josh Hawley Wants To Break Up Big Tech And Revisit How Antitrust Matters Are Considered

Senator Josh Hawley talks Section 230, antitrust reform, and the Capitol riots.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

Josh Hawley, right, via Flickr

WASHINGTON, October 15, 2010 – Cablevision customers may be cut off from watching baseball in upcoming days if a business dispute between the cable company and a local broadcaster isn’t resolved by midnight Friday.

The New York cable television company is once again fighting over the fees it must pay a broadcaster — in this case Fox — to provide the programming to its own customers.

Cable companies have been complaining that broadcasters have been holding them hostage and using high profile events such as this week-end’s baseball playoffs to jack up their fees.

Broadcasters, for their part, say that their programming is worth significantly more than what the cable companies are paying for it.

Earlier this year, Time Warner Cable reached an agreement with Belo Corp. over this issue of retransmission consent fees. The two companies agreed on undisclosed terms for Belo’s 12 stations around the country, as well as local news networks, according to a report in the trade magazine Broadcasting and Cable.

“This state of affairs is getting tiresome as these disputes grow more frequent,” said Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge’s president and co-founder, who was one of the petitioners for a rule-making at the FCC to address the issue earlier this year. “It is because of situations like this that Public Knowledge joined 13 other parties in March to ask the FCC to consider changing the rules governing the terms and conditions under which broadcast stations are carried on cable networks.”

The petition proposes that the broadcasters should continue to allow the cable companies to carry their signals even after the contracts between the two sides have expired as the two sides negotiate, among other things.

Cablevision, along with Time Warner Cable, and the American Cable Association were among the 13 petitioners.

For a review of the issues at stake, and what the companies’ lobbyists are arguing in policy circles in Washington, DC, readers can refer to the Intellectual Property Breakfast Club’s event video from this June.

Continue Reading

Social Media

Oversight Board Upholds Trump’s Ban From Facebook

The Oversight Board has sent the decision back to Facebook management, criticizing it for setting a “standardless” penalty.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

WASHINGTON, October 15, 2010 – Cablevision customers may be cut off from watching baseball in upcoming days if a business dispute between the cable company and a local broadcaster isn’t resolved by midnight Friday.

The New York cable television company is once again fighting over the fees it must pay a broadcaster — in this case Fox — to provide the programming to its own customers.

Cable companies have been complaining that broadcasters have been holding them hostage and using high profile events such as this week-end’s baseball playoffs to jack up their fees.

Broadcasters, for their part, say that their programming is worth significantly more than what the cable companies are paying for it.

Earlier this year, Time Warner Cable reached an agreement with Belo Corp. over this issue of retransmission consent fees. The two companies agreed on undisclosed terms for Belo’s 12 stations around the country, as well as local news networks, according to a report in the trade magazine Broadcasting and Cable.

“This state of affairs is getting tiresome as these disputes grow more frequent,” said Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge’s president and co-founder, who was one of the petitioners for a rule-making at the FCC to address the issue earlier this year. “It is because of situations like this that Public Knowledge joined 13 other parties in March to ask the FCC to consider changing the rules governing the terms and conditions under which broadcast stations are carried on cable networks.”

The petition proposes that the broadcasters should continue to allow the cable companies to carry their signals even after the contracts between the two sides have expired as the two sides negotiate, among other things.

Cablevision, along with Time Warner Cable, and the American Cable Association were among the 13 petitioners.

For a review of the issues at stake, and what the companies’ lobbyists are arguing in policy circles in Washington, DC, readers can refer to the Intellectual Property Breakfast Club’s event video from this June.

Continue Reading

Big Tech

Lina Khan Pitches Ideas For Regulating Big Tech In Nomination Hearing

Senate Commerce Committee considers nominations for Lina Khan, Bill Nelson and Leslie Kiernan.

Tim White

Published

on

Screenshot of Lina Khan at Senate hearing

WASHINGTON, October 15, 2010 – Cablevision customers may be cut off from watching baseball in upcoming days if a business dispute between the cable company and a local broadcaster isn’t resolved by midnight Friday.

The New York cable television company is once again fighting over the fees it must pay a broadcaster — in this case Fox — to provide the programming to its own customers.

Cable companies have been complaining that broadcasters have been holding them hostage and using high profile events such as this week-end’s baseball playoffs to jack up their fees.

Broadcasters, for their part, say that their programming is worth significantly more than what the cable companies are paying for it.

Earlier this year, Time Warner Cable reached an agreement with Belo Corp. over this issue of retransmission consent fees. The two companies agreed on undisclosed terms for Belo’s 12 stations around the country, as well as local news networks, according to a report in the trade magazine Broadcasting and Cable.

“This state of affairs is getting tiresome as these disputes grow more frequent,” said Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge’s president and co-founder, who was one of the petitioners for a rule-making at the FCC to address the issue earlier this year. “It is because of situations like this that Public Knowledge joined 13 other parties in March to ask the FCC to consider changing the rules governing the terms and conditions under which broadcast stations are carried on cable networks.”

The petition proposes that the broadcasters should continue to allow the cable companies to carry their signals even after the contracts between the two sides have expired as the two sides negotiate, among other things.

Cablevision, along with Time Warner Cable, and the American Cable Association were among the 13 petitioners.

For a review of the issues at stake, and what the companies’ lobbyists are arguing in policy circles in Washington, DC, readers can refer to the Intellectual Property Breakfast Club’s event video from this June.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending