Asia
European and Chinese Pressures are Squeezing Silicon Valley, Threatening a Global ‘Splinternet’

WASHINGTON, July 9, 2018 – The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation is raising the danger of the “splinternet” syndrome, as top tech companies prioritize international standards over American ones, warned experts at a June 28 event of the Federalist Society.
Officials from Google, Microsoft, and cybersecurity company Endgame addressed growing cybersecurity concerns that international industries serve to America’s national security, and not that of Europe.
Additionally, tech companies have also been upset about a new California data protection law, signed June 28, that requires companies to allow consumers to opt out of data collection.
Panelists warned that the law has the potential to alter a company’s entire business model surrounding revenue from data collection. The legislation has many similarities to the GDPR, in effect since May 25, that imposes heavy regulations on user data collection of EU residents.
The worrisome prospect of a ‘splinternet’ to the global internet
Andrea Limbago, representative of cybersecurity company Endgame, warned that new international regulations like the GDPR are moving the internet “more towards the ‘splinternet’ versus the global internet.”
Countries’ different privacy demands makes the internet more fractured and causes problems for the tech industry, she said. GDPR mandates and the idea of cyber sovereignty for government access to data “are directly in conflict,” Limbago continued.
She instead touted “cyber sovereignty,” referring to the concept that a government should have control over internet usage, access, and services within their own country, from the technological side to political.
Because GDPR applies to not only EU companies, but to any company that engages with EU online users, rules established by the GDPR potentially interfere with another country’s ability to collect data on their online servers if that data belongs to an EU online user.
Which international norms are likely to prevail?
In America, outrage over how American companies store user data recently bubbled over the boiling point in Congress with additional revelations about whether Facebook allowed for the storage of consumer data on devices manufactured by the Chinese telecom equipment company Huawei.
Huawei has well-known ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
According to Limbago’s argument, while the GDPR pushes for protections of the individual, such as the right to be forgotten, other countries–such as China– could claim “cyber sovereignty” and enact laws that demand a company storing data on its land or of its people to provide that data regardless of an individual’s consent.
“If our tech or government in favor of democracy is not pushing forth these norms, others will push forward their own norms,” Limbago said, advocating for the U.S. government to enact firm, democratic rules of the road for the international cybersecurity space.
Google and Microsoft defend an increasingly beleaguered internationalism
When asked about how Microsoft and Google are responding to the flap over Facebook and Huawei, neither Google nor Microsoft expressed a desire to pull out of international agreements, despite legal complications that may arise.
Microsoft representative Angela McKay defended the practice of buying and partnering with other companies–including international companies–claiming it is good for competition in the marketplace. Managing Microsoft’s supply chain is a “way to use market forces to increase security over time,” McKay said.
Google representative David Lieber agreed with McKay. Lieber said that Google has many international partners within the supply chain, but looks to new methods of reducing the national security threat that supply chains can cause.
“One of the ways to reduce risk in a supply chain is to reduce complexity,” Lieber said. Regarding data storage, he suggested examining the infrastructure that stores the data. For Google Cloud services, “The servers that reside in those data centers storing Google account data are custom designed. They have a stripped down operating system,” he said, which can reduce the risk of cybersecurity threats.
New international pressures on Silicon Valley could overcome tech companies’ resistance
However, former National Security Agency General Counsel Stewart Baker raised concerns over how the pressures Silicon Valley faces from international regulations could overpower pressures from the U.S. government.
According to Baker, European policies such as GDPR are imposing “massive fines and liability” on tech giants. Silicon Valley is pressured to comply with international regulations while resisting American regulations.
“Frankly, it’s just easier to regulate it if you don’t have an industry of your own,” Baker said. “[The Europeans] don’t and so they’re happy to beat up big tech from the United States.”
He explained tech giants must cooperate with laws in Russia and China or face being banned in the countries, whereas in the U.S., the companies gain leverage by hiring lobbyists and massive numbers of employees, and thus “don’t mind fighting the U.S. government.”
Rekindling fears of foreign interference in the political space, Baker accused Silicon Valley of allowing European hate speech laws to undermine the free speech of Trump supporters.
“When they are told to eliminate hate speech online by the Europeans,” Baker said, “they just don’t have any trouble agreeing that hate speech is pretty much anything that Trump voters say–and finding ways to disadvantage it in subtle and unsubtle ways.”
(Photo of the Federalist Society event by Heather Heimbach)
Artificial Intelligence
U.S. Chip Export Restrictions Will be ‘Huge Roadblock’ for Chinese AI Competitiveness: Expert
China will need to manufacture advanced chips domestically if it wants to continue researching and implementing AI.

WASHINGTON, August 24, 2023 – China’s ability to remain competitive in the global artificial intelligence race will depend on its ability to produce its own chips, as U.S. restrictions on the export of that product to the adversarial nation will hobble its ability to move forward, experts said Thursday.
“U.S. chip export sanctions are a huge roadblock” for AI development in China, said Qiheng Chen, a senior analyst at consulting firm Compass Lexecon.
The ability to manufacture advanced chips domestically will be essential for the country to continue researching and implementing AI, Chen added at the AI event hosted by the Asia Society Policy Institute.
The Commerce Department imposed in October 2022 restrictions on exports of advanced semiconductors and chip manufacturing equipment to China and required U.S. citizens to get a permit before working with Chinese chip manufacturers.
The move was designed to limit China’s ability to compete with the U.S. by curbing its access to hardware required for cutting-edge military technology. It also makes AI research and development, a highly chip-dependent process, more difficult.
Other panelists Tuesday emphasized chip making as a top priority of the Chinese government.
The country has already moved toward independence from the U.S. in other areas, like satellites and fiber optics, as a response to Trump administration policies.
This has continued under President Joe Biden, with a 2021 executive order restricting investment in Chinese firms drawing criticism from Huawei, the Chinese telecom company.
Experts have previously said the threat of restricting access to global trade even further could make China hesitant to retaliate for the sanctions. This is because advanced chip manufacturing requires materials, components, and processes that would be difficult for a single nation to source entirely within its borders.
“It’s too complex, too global, too interdependent for one country to be able to produce all these technologies on their own,” said Jimmy Goodrich, vice president of Global Policy at the Semiconductor Industry Association, at a conference earlier this year.
A Huawei spokesperson estimated at a conference following the investment ban that it would take three to five years for Chinese chip manufacturing to become self-sufficient and rely less on American components and investments.
Biden signed the CHIPS and Science Act into law last year, two months before the export restrictions went into effect. It allocates $52 billion for American semiconductor manufacturing and gives tax credits for investments in the industry.
China
Former National Security Advisor Warns of American Semiconductor Weakness Against China
The semiconductor industry in America is vulnerable, warned a former National Security Advisor.

WASHINGTON, August 2, 2023 – The United States needs to collaborate with its allies to ensure semiconductor supply chain resilience, said a former National Security Advisor.
Robert O’Brien, chairman of strategic advisory firm American Global Strategies, said at a Hudson Institute event Tuesday that the semiconductor industry — the chips that run all electronic devices — is a primary industry of concern for competition with China.
O’Brien urged the government to cooperate with allies to onshore, moving plants onto domestic land, and “friend-shore,” moving plants into allying countries, manufacturing plants. Failing to do so will subject the U.S. and its allies to additional risks in the future, he said.
The United States’ advantage is that it has “real allies” that share its beliefs and values, particularly for liberty and a free market, said O’Brien. In contrast, China has very few allies that share its values and are not paid for their loyalty, he said. He urged the U.S. to capitalize on its strengths.
There are many countries, including Philippines, Thailand, India, and Mexico that have manufacturing capability that can support American demand in place of China, he said.
Beijing is not interested in being an economic partner, O’Brien warned. In 2020, the country had over 22,000 companies in the semiconductor industry. The sector only continues to grow as China’s policies provide incentives for companies to produce at scale.
Appeasement and negotiation are not options when dealing with China, said O’Brien. China does not play by the same rules as western states, it generates wealth by stealing the intellectual property of American companies. There is no way to compete with China if we continue to allow theft to happen, he said.
Ultimately, the competition between the countries is not a squabble over ideals, but instead a fight between liberty and the “worst form” of totalitarianism, claimed O’Brien. For this reason, he suggested that the Biden Administration take measures to limit American private investment in the Chinese government.
President Joe Biden’s Investing in America initiative is investing billions of dollars into the United States’ domestic manufacturing. Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act and CHIPS and Science Act in 2021 which invest in America’s electric vehicle and green energy plans and semiconductor manufacturing.
Biden ran his presidential election campaign on his initiative to move companies onshore, defend American supply chains, and create more jobs. According to the White House, the agenda has “already attracted hundreds of billions of dollars in private investment and created nearly 800,000 new manufacturing jobs in everything from semiconductors and electric car batteries to clean energy technology and more.”
India
American Technology Companies Announce Investments in Chip Manufacturing in India
The fab in India is designed to ensure the stability of critical semiconductor capacity and hence enhance U.S. national security.

WASHINGTON, June 28, 2023 – American chip manufacturer Micron Technology announced Thursday plans to invest up to $825 million in building its first chip assembly and test facility in Gujarat, India, which is intended to reduce America’s reliance on China for semiconductors.
The total investment for the facility, with support from the Indian central government and the state of Gujarat, is expected to reach $2.75 billion.
The United States holds just 12 percent of the semiconductor market share globally, and the announcement is intended to partly remedy that. Semiconductors are required for several advanced industries, including electronics, telecommunications, and automotive.
The ongoing worldwide shortage of semiconductors has also caused disruptions in supply chains impacting industries on a global scale. The fab in India is designed to ensure the stability of critical industries and enhance U.S. national security.
The partnership between India and the U.S. in the semiconductor sector is viewed as a means to counter China’s dominance in cutting-edge technologies. The U.S.-India memorandum of understanding on establishing a semiconductor supply chain, signed in March, seeks to enhance collaboration and diversify the supply chain. This partnership aligns with the U.S. strategy of strengthening connections with Asian allies.
Experts see the signing of the memorandum as an opportunity for both nations to reduce global dependency on China.
“The MoU seeks to establish a collaborative mechanism for the semiconductor supply chain resiliency and diversification in view of the US CHIPS and Science Act and India Semiconductor Mission (ISM),” said Charlie Dai, vice president, and research director at research firm Forrester.
The Quad Alliance, comprising India, the U.S., Japan, and Australia, has collaborated to secure supply chains in semiconductors and 5G telecom technologies. By becoming a part of the global semiconductor supply chain, India aims to achieve a balanced regional distribution of chip manufacturing share and eat into China’s share of the market – becoming America’s primary supplier of semiconductors for the time being.
The new facility in Gujarat will focus on the production of ball grid array (BGA) integrated circuit packages, memory modules, and solid-state drives. Micron aims to commence construction in 2023, with the first phase becoming operational in late 2024. The project’s second phase is planned for the latter half of the decade, creating up to 5,000 new jobs for the company both in America and India.
Alongside the investment from Micron, semiconductor toolmaker Applied Materials will invest $400 million over four years in a new engineering center in India, the company said on Thursday. Lam Research also pledged to train 60,000 Indian engineers through its Semiverse Solution virtual fabrication platform, thus increasing the labor pool as well.
“Lam’s Semiverse Solutions portfolio is a game-changer that provides a foundation to create a virtual semiconductor innovation universe,” said corporate vice president David Fried in a press release. “As the semiconductor ecosystem races to scale to address the criticality of chips, the virtual-physical fabrication world made possible with Semiverse Solutions opens the door for exciting new opportunities for collaboration, workforce development and advanced technology breakthroughs.”
-
#broadbandlive4 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast on September 13, 2023 – AT&T and BlackRock’s Gigapower Joint Venture
-
Broadband Roundup4 weeks ago
AT&T Launches New Fixed Wireless Service, Lawsuits Over Lead Cables, $27M for Rural South Dakota Broadband
-
Funding4 weeks ago
Do Not Overlook Other Broadband Programs, say Experts
-
Funding4 weeks ago
Precursors to BEAD Implementation: A Deep Dive Into Prior Broadband Programs
-
Community Broadband3 weeks ago
Rural Broadband Provider Touts Cooperative and Coalition-based Models
-
Artificial Intelligence4 weeks ago
U.S. Chip Export Restrictions Will be ‘Huge Roadblock’ for Chinese AI Competitiveness: Expert
-
Broadband Roundup3 weeks ago
5G Fund for Rural America, FCC Disaster Information Reporting System, US Cellular Expands 5G,
-
Funding4 weeks ago
Virginia and Louisiana Each Release BEAD Implementation Plans, Volume Two