Connect with us

Broadband News

Time to Focus on California Legislation That Affects Infrastructure Access to Rights-of-Way and Conduit, says EFF

Drew Clark

Published

on

BROADBAND BREAKFAST INSIGHT: California, and many other states, have muscled their way onto the national broadband stage. They’ve done this through legislation that would either require net neutrality protections that the Federal Communications Commission removed in December 2017, or use state purchase power to require that selected Internet Service Providers commit to neutrality principles, or both. In this piece from Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Ernesto Falcon, the non-profit group is urging renewed focus on a law that governs access to rights of way and underground conduit. Bonus quote: “Californians have very little access to wholesale open access fiber companies, or any broadband provider that is not a cable TV or telephone company. That differs significantly from places such as Utah, where people have eleven choices for gigabit fiber at around $50 a month.”

Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Californians have successfully pushed the state’s legislature to restore two-thirds of the 2015 Open Internet Order through state laws. Stopping legislation from Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez—backed by AT&T and Comcast (A.B. 1366)—is the final piece to bringing back those critical protections to promote broadband choice.

The California Assembly will soon take up this bill, which would renew a 2011 ISP-backed law that expires this year. That law had the stated goal of promoting choice and competition for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services. In practice, however, it has sidelined state and local governments from exerting authority over broadband and led to fewer choices for consumers at higher prices.

Today, most Californians face a monopoly for high-speed broadband access. If we let the 2011 law expire, California could instead choose to empower state and local governments to create policies to eliminate local monopolies. Doing so now is even more crucial than it was in 2011, as the FCC no longer oversees the broadband industry.

[more…]

Source: Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Drew Clark is the Editor and Publisher of BroadbandBreakfast.com and a nationally-respected telecommunications attorney at The CommLaw Group. He has closely tracked the trends in and mechanics of digital infrastructure for 20 years, and has helped fiber-based and fixed wireless providers navigate coverage, identify markets, broker infrastructure, and operate in the public right of way. The articles and posts on Broadband Breakfast and affiliated social media, including the BroadbandCensus Twitter feed, are not legal advice or legal services, do not constitute the creation of an attorney-client privilege, and represent the views of their respective authors.

Broadband Roundup

Boost Bundles TeleHealth, $100M For South Dakota Broadband, Frequencz Gets Financing

Boost is bundling telehealth services, South Dakota planning $100 million for broadband, Frequencz gets $4 million in capital.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem

BROADBAND BREAKFAST INSIGHT: California, and many other states, have muscled their way onto the national broadband stage. They’ve done this through legislation that would either require net neutrality protections that the Federal Communications Commission removed in December 2017, or use state purchase power to require that selected Internet Service Providers commit to neutrality principles, or both. In this piece from Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Ernesto Falcon, the non-profit group is urging renewed focus on a law that governs access to rights of way and underground conduit. Bonus quote: “Californians have very little access to wholesale open access fiber companies, or any broadband provider that is not a cable TV or telephone company. That differs significantly from places such as Utah, where people have eleven choices for gigabit fiber at around $50 a month.”

Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Californians have successfully pushed the state’s legislature to restore two-thirds of the 2015 Open Internet Order through state laws. Stopping legislation from Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez—backed by AT&T and Comcast (A.B. 1366)—is the final piece to bringing back those critical protections to promote broadband choice.

The California Assembly will soon take up this bill, which would renew a 2011 ISP-backed law that expires this year. That law had the stated goal of promoting choice and competition for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services. In practice, however, it has sidelined state and local governments from exerting authority over broadband and led to fewer choices for consumers at higher prices.

Today, most Californians face a monopoly for high-speed broadband access. If we let the 2011 law expire, California could instead choose to empower state and local governments to create policies to eliminate local monopolies. Doing so now is even more crucial than it was in 2011, as the FCC no longer oversees the broadband industry.

[more…]

Source: Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Continue Reading

Broadband Roundup

NY Sued Over Low-Cost Internet, Apple Antitrust Allegations, CETF Concludes Surveys, 5G Device Growth

New York sued over $15 internet, Apple faces EU antitrust allegations, California surveys conclude, and 5G device adoption grows.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

New York faces backlash from telcos over new bill that establishes low-tier service.

BROADBAND BREAKFAST INSIGHT: California, and many other states, have muscled their way onto the national broadband stage. They’ve done this through legislation that would either require net neutrality protections that the Federal Communications Commission removed in December 2017, or use state purchase power to require that selected Internet Service Providers commit to neutrality principles, or both. In this piece from Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Ernesto Falcon, the non-profit group is urging renewed focus on a law that governs access to rights of way and underground conduit. Bonus quote: “Californians have very little access to wholesale open access fiber companies, or any broadband provider that is not a cable TV or telephone company. That differs significantly from places such as Utah, where people have eleven choices for gigabit fiber at around $50 a month.”

Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Californians have successfully pushed the state’s legislature to restore two-thirds of the 2015 Open Internet Order through state laws. Stopping legislation from Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez—backed by AT&T and Comcast (A.B. 1366)—is the final piece to bringing back those critical protections to promote broadband choice.

The California Assembly will soon take up this bill, which would renew a 2011 ISP-backed law that expires this year. That law had the stated goal of promoting choice and competition for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services. In practice, however, it has sidelined state and local governments from exerting authority over broadband and led to fewer choices for consumers at higher prices.

Today, most Californians face a monopoly for high-speed broadband access. If we let the 2011 law expire, California could instead choose to empower state and local governments to create policies to eliminate local monopolies. Doing so now is even more crucial than it was in 2011, as the FCC no longer oversees the broadband industry.

[more…]

Source: Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Continue Reading

Broadband Roundup

Verizon Selling Digital Properties, Florida Aims To Limit Social Media Bans, Starry Participating In EBB

Verizon is selling Yahoo and AOL, Florida going after social platforms, and Starry is getting in on EBB.

Benjamin Kahn

Published

on

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis

BROADBAND BREAKFAST INSIGHT: California, and many other states, have muscled their way onto the national broadband stage. They’ve done this through legislation that would either require net neutrality protections that the Federal Communications Commission removed in December 2017, or use state purchase power to require that selected Internet Service Providers commit to neutrality principles, or both. In this piece from Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Ernesto Falcon, the non-profit group is urging renewed focus on a law that governs access to rights of way and underground conduit. Bonus quote: “Californians have very little access to wholesale open access fiber companies, or any broadband provider that is not a cable TV or telephone company. That differs significantly from places such as Utah, where people have eleven choices for gigabit fiber at around $50 a month.”

Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Californians have successfully pushed the state’s legislature to restore two-thirds of the 2015 Open Internet Order through state laws. Stopping legislation from Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez—backed by AT&T and Comcast (A.B. 1366)—is the final piece to bringing back those critical protections to promote broadband choice.

The California Assembly will soon take up this bill, which would renew a 2011 ISP-backed law that expires this year. That law had the stated goal of promoting choice and competition for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services. In practice, however, it has sidelined state and local governments from exerting authority over broadband and led to fewer choices for consumers at higher prices.

Today, most Californians face a monopoly for high-speed broadband access. If we let the 2011 law expire, California could instead choose to empower state and local governments to create policies to eliminate local monopolies. Doing so now is even more crucial than it was in 2011, as the FCC no longer oversees the broadband industry.

[more…]

Source: Don’t Let California’s Legislature Extend Broadband Monopolies for Comcast and AT&T | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending