Connect with us


Republican and Democratic Senators Agree that Big Tech is Hoarding the Value of Consumers’ Digital Data



Photo of Senate Banking Committee hearing by Masha Abarinova

WASHINGTON, October 25, 2019 – A growing bipartisan consensus emerged from a Thursday Senate Banking Committee hearing that technology companies are improperly extracting the bulk of the value of consumers’ online digital data.

Private companies are collecting and analyzing individual data for all kinds of purposes, said Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho., in his opening remarks. More personal information is available to companies than ever before and people have questions about how this data is used.

It’s crucial to identify the concept of data ownership, Crapo continued. Moreover, individuals are concerned with the worth of their data in the marketplace and how they can make use of it themselves.

Americans, not Silicon Valley CEOS, should have control over their private information, said Ranking Member Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio. Privacy isn’t partisan but a basic right. Big tech companies don’t make money off protecting privacy, he said, hence why they aren’t acting in that area.

Individuals should know what information is being collected at the granular level, said Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va. They should know their data’s worth and the contact it has with third parties.

There’s nothing “free” about what companies like Facebook and Google are offering, Warner said. Established companies don’t want more transparency about how data is monetized and whether it differentiates among individuals.

Whether or not data is considered property, said Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., companies are making money off its value. Out of the 95 billion dollars Facebook made last year, he said, most of the revenue came from targeted advertisements.

In response to the committee members’ concerns, the witnesses emphasized the need to address and reform privacy legislation.

Matching privacy law to the European Union’s GDPR is not enough, said Jeffrey Ritter, founding chair at the American Bar Association Committee on Cyberspace Law. The US needs to address and define ownership rights of personal information, so that the rights of data subjects are more readily enforced and commercial innovation built around personal information can thrive.

Domestic laws governing electronic transferable records, Ritter said, can help craft the legal concept of data ownership. Recognizing data ownership should not diminish a data subject’s rights or existing federal laws governing financial systems.

Privacy legislation needs an affirmative consent-based model allowing users to opt in or out of sharing their data, said Chad Marlow, senior advocacy and policy counsel at American Civil Liberties Union. California and Maine, for example, are states that have taken some steps to advance individual’s control over their personal information.

Treating data as property, Marlow added, would distract policymakers from pursuing meaningful privacy legislation. The private sector entrepreneurs advocating for this model, he said, want to use the government’s power to mandate that the data-selling marketplace is advertised to individuals at the time their information is being collected.

Additionally, he said, financially secure Americans will find it easier to opt out of the data as property model, whereas lower-income individuals may have significantly fewer choices in the matter.

Although data property rights are risky, said Will Rinehart, director of Technology and Innovation Policy at American Action Forum, there will be serious costs involved with any new privacy law, especially with compliance. Regulations will force firms to retool data processes and change the investment dynamics of the affected industries.

Not only is a property right not needed to establish consumer rights, said Rinehart, but it would be economically inefficient to do so.

The American economy has largely forgotten the data user, said Michelle Dennedy, CEO at DrumWave Inc. The greater the data set, she said, the less value individual data has for a company.

Rather than trying to analyze all of a user’s transactions, Dennedy said, the goal should be to identify errant or inaccurate transactions. Perhaps analyzing different aspects of an individual’s online worth, such as copyright, participation or branding can form a new type of privacy right.


Experts Wrangle Over Whether Online Children Protection Legislation Needs Overhaul

‘We can’t keep overhauling the regulatory structure.’



WASHINGTON, June 21, 2022 – Observers at an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation event on Wednesday urged Washington not to take legislation protecting children online down the path of congressional overhaul, instead preferring guidance for the existing text to come from its administrator, the Federal Trade Commission.

The Child Online Privacy Protection Act, passed in 1998, includes online data protections for children under 13. In 2013, as designated by Congress, the FTC updated enforcement rules, giving parents more control over the online collection of their children’s personal information.

Since then, new advances in technology and social media has brought COPPA to the attention of many who consider substantive changes are needed, including privacy experts, senators and U.S. President Joe Biden, who addressed it in his State of the Union address earlier this year.

Some lawmakers have long called for an age increase for those protections through legislative reforms, which came before lawmakers this month introduced a proposal for the first federal privacy law, which would include data privacy protections for children under 17.

“We can’t keep overhauling the regulatory structure,” said Julia Tama, partner at law firm Venable LLP. “It takes a big investment for companies to come up to speed.”

Instead, she said, she wants “improvements on what we have rather than replacing it with a completely different framework.”

In May, the FTC issued a policy statement that will guide its enforcement of COPPA. It focused on four provisions: limiting the amount of data collected for children’s access to educational tools; restricting types of data collected and requiring reasons for why they are being collected; prohibiting ed tech companies from holding on to data for speculative purposes; and prohibiting the use of the data for targeted advertising purposes.

Graham Dufault, senior director for public policy at the App Association, said the FTC should be responsible for potential provisions made to COPPA. “The FTC’s enforcement of COPPA is a really important thing for us.”

But panelist James Cooper, associate professor of law and director of the program on economics and privacy at George Mason University, said COPPA isn’t in need of any major revisions. He said if the legislation requires change, he doesn’t want to see it done through FTC policy statements and instead should come from the crafters in Congress.

“If the FTC feels [the need to] expand COPPA beyond its current boundaries, it should go back to Congress,” Cooper said.

Continue Reading


Expand Online Protections for 17-Year-Olds in Draft Federal Privacy Law, Committee Urged

The draft privacy law includes a provision to enhance privacy protections online for children under 17.



Photo of the hearing held by the subcommittee on consumer protection and commerce

WASHINGTON, June 16, 2022 – Panelists before the subcommittee on consumer protection and commerce recommended Tuesday that a newly-crafted draft for federal privacy legislation introduced earlier this month include online protections for 17-year-olds.

The draft of the American Data Privacy and Protection Act, which would be the first federal privacy law, includes a provision to enhance privacy protections online for children under 17, including restrictions on Big Tech platforms’ data collection and targeted advertisements to those age groups.

But testimony from Jolina Cuaresma, senior counsel on privacy and technology policy at Common Sense Media, suggested that the language include 17-year-olds as well.

If the bill becomes law, she said this would provide a substantial upgrade to the Child Online Protection Privacy Act, which provides online protections for children under 13. “We need to cover all minors under the draft’s protections,” Cuaresma said, adding, “one in four children between the ages of 9 and 17 have had a sexual encounter with an adult online.”

With ongoing discussion about potential changes to COPPA and ensuring children’s privacy online due to increasing use of online educational tools and social media, Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fl, stated during the hearing, “there is room for improvement in the draft for children’s protections.”

Big Tech regulation

Witnesses also said the draft should make clearer limits for Big Tech companies. Caitriona Fitzgerald, deputy director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said, “technology companies have too much power” and have been unregulated for too long. She urged the bill to define responsibilities more clearly for big tech companies, individuals, states, and federal entities.

Chairman Frank Pallone Jr. of the energy and commerce committee stated that if the bill passes, “our kids will be protected from abusive advertising and data transfers, and businesses will be required to protect consumer data or face real consequences.

“Comprehensive national privacy legislation is necessary to limit the excesses of Big Tech and ensure Americans can safely navigate the digital world,” said Pallone.

Continue Reading


Draft of Bipartisan ‘Years-in-the-Making’ Privacy Bill Released

The bill is bipartisan, and a joint effort between the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Commerce Committee.



Photo of Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., from his website.

WASHINGTON, June 3, 2022 – Leaders of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Senate Commerce Committee announced on Friday a discussion draft of a “comprehensive” data privacy bill that they say has been in the making for years.

The bipartisan bill overall addresses a national data privacy framework, a set of consumers’ data privacy rights and appropriate enforcement mechanisms.

The release was announced by the House committee’s Chairman Frank Pallone, D-N.J., its ranking member Rep. Cathy McMorris-Rodgers, R-Wash., and the Senate committee’s ranking member Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss.

In the coming weeks, we will be working with our colleagues on both sides of the aisle to build support and finalize this standard to give Americans more control over their personal data,” they said.

“We welcome and encourage all of our colleagues to join us in this effort to enable meaningful privacy protections for Americans and provide businesses with operational certainty. This landmark agreement represents the sum of years of good faith efforts by us, other members, and numerous stakeholders as we work together to provide American consumers with comprehensive data privacy protections.”

They called the release of the draft a “critical milestone.”

The proposed bill would grant Americans protections against discriminatory use of their data, require covered entities to minimize on the front end the data they collect, enforce loyalty duties and prevent customers from needing to pay for privacy, prohibit targeted advertising for covered entities, enhance data protections for children and minors and establish “regulatory parity” across the internet.

Child privacy has been a particular topic of interest on Capitol Hill, with several high profile hearings taking place with social media companies to investigate their practices of catering to teenage users.

Continue Reading


Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field