Connect with us

Antitrust

Broadband Roundup: Judge Approves T-Mobile/Sprint Deal, New York Times on Facial Privacy, CBRS Decision Coming

Published

on

Photo ofĀ Victor Marrero courtesy Justice Resource Center

A New York federal court on Tuesday refused to block the planned $56 billion merger between T-Mobile and Sprint, Law360 reports, rejecting a challenge by 14 state attorneys general to the deal.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero issued an order siding with the companies, and with the U.S. Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission, which had already approved the merger. As a result, the deal will likely be able to go forward

During the New York City trial in December, T-Mobile and Sprint had argued argued that the merger would help them to better compete against AT&T and Verizon, especially while racing to roll out 5G wireless networks.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai expressed satisfaction with the decision. ā€œThe T-Mobile-Sprint merger will help close the digital divide and secure United States leadership in 5G, he said.Ā  ā€œAfter the merger, T-Mobile has committed to bringing 5G to 97 percent of our nation’s population within three years and 99 percent of Americans within six years.ā€

New York Times podcast profiles journalist’s inquiry into Clearview AI

New York Times Journalist Kashmir Hill was interviewed on the NYT’s podcast, The Daily, on Monday, February 10, 2020. Hill detailed her investigation into Clearview AI, an artificial intelligence facial recognition company that can identify people through a huge database compiled of online photos. The technology is already being used by some law enforcement.

After an extensive search for Clearview AI personnel, Hill was finally able to interview the company’s CEO, Hoan Ton-That. In the podcast, Hill details Ton-That’s light-hearted response to her privacy concerns.

Donie O’Sullivan ofĀ CNN Business reports: ā€œClearview AI is controversial for many reasons, but perhaps the most important is its massive database. The company claims to have scraped more than 3 billion photos from the internet, including from popular social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube. Not only that, but Clearview retains those photos in its database even after users delete them from the platforms or make their accounts private.ā€

ā€œThe practice has prompted the likes of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to send Clearview cease-and-desist letters,ā€ wrote O’Sullivan.

Follow this link to listen to The Daily podcast episode.

FCC to address the size of Priority Access License areas in CBRS auction in February

Federal Communications Commissioner Michael O’Rielly announced that the Commission will vote in the February meeting on the area size of the Priority Access License areas in the Citizens Broadband Radio Service spectrum at 3.5 GigaHertz (GHz), and which will be the subject of a planned FCC auction in June 2020.

In his statement, O’Rielly said, ā€œHaving taken the lead on the issue, I’ll admit that it has been a long road to get here, but this important step represents one of the last actions the Commission needs to take to make these critical mid-band licenses available for 5G and other next-generation wireless services.

“Ultimately, this auction will provide the first new, mid-band licenses for 5G (albeit with inferior power limits), and it is expected that, given the importance of mid-band’s capacity and propagation, it will provide a spectrum foothold for those deploying these next-generation networks,” he said. “Yet, since this CBRS structure is the first of its kind to incorporate licensed and unlicensed-like opportunities, it is of interest to a wide variety of users.ā€

ā€œWhile there are still some outstanding issues that ought to be reconsidered in this band, such as ways to reduce the protection area sizes and increasing power limits, the auction is not dependent on these being resolved at this exact moment,ā€ said O’Rielly.

The February commission meeting will take place on February 28.

Adrienne Patton was a Reporter for Broadband Breakfast. She studied English rhetoric and writing at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. She grew up in a household of journalists in South Florida. Her father, the late Robes Patton, was a sports writer for the Sun-Sentinel who covered the Miami Heat, and is for whom the press lounge in the American Airlines Arena is named.

Antitrust

FTC Funding Request Harshly Criticized by Republican Lawmakers

The agency’s aggressive approach to antitrust under Chair Lina Khan has sparked controversy.

Published

on

Screenshot of FTC Chair Lina Khan courtesy of the House Energy and Commerce Committee

WASHINGTON, April 19, 2023 — House Republicans expressed skepticism about the Federal Trade Commission’s requested budget increase during a Tuesday hearing, accusing the agency of overstepping its jurisdiction in pursuit of a progressive enforcement agenda.

The hearing of the Innovation, Data and Commerce Subcommittee showcased sharp partisan tension over Chair Lina Khan’s aggressive approach to antitrust — heightened by the fact that both Republican seats on the five-member agency remain vacant.

Khan, alongside Democratic Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, argued that the $160 million budget increase was necessary for maintaining existing enforcement efforts as well as ā€œactivating additional authorities that Congress has given us.ā€

But Republican lawmakers seemed unwilling to grant the requested funds, which would bring the agency’s total annual budget to $590 million.

ā€œYou seem to be squandering away the resources that we currently give you in favor of pursuing unprecedented progressive legal theories,ā€ said Subcommittee Chair Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla.

ā€œWhat is clearly needed — before Congress considers any new authorities or funding — are reforms, more guardrails and increased transparency to ensure you are accountable to the American people,ā€ said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., chair of the Energy and Commerce Committee.

Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., ranking member of the full committee, defended the funding request by saying the FTC has ā€œone of the broadest purviews of any federal agency: fighting deceptive and unfair business practices and anti-competitive conduct across the entire economy.ā€

ā€œManaging this portfolio with less than fourteen hundred employees is no small feat,ā€ Pallone said, noting that the FTC currently has fewer employees than it did 45 years ago.

FTC highlights potential AI threats, other tech developments

FTC staff and Democratic lawmakers have been flagging concerns about understaffing at the agency for years, arguing that rapid technological and market changes have increased the scope and complexity of the agency’s role.

ā€œThe same lawyers who ensure that social media companies have robust privacy and data security programs are making sure labels on bed linens are correct,ā€ testified former Chief Technologist Ashkan Soltani at a Senate hearing in 2021.

In their written testimony, commissioners detailed several emerging priorities related to technological developments — such as combatting online harms to children and protecting sensitive consumer data shared with health websites — and emphasized the corresponding need for increased resources.

The agency is also preparing to pursue violations related to artificial intelligence technologies, Khan said, as the ā€œturbocharging of fraud and scams that could be enabled by these tools are a serious concern.ā€

But several tech-focused trade groups, including the Computer & Communications Industry Association, have signaled opposition to FTC expansion.

ā€œThe FTC can best carry out its mission if it heeds the committee’s call to return its focus to consumer needs and consumer fraud — rather than pursuing cases rooted in novel theories against American companies,ā€ CCIA President Matt Schruers said after the hearing.

The Consumer Technology Association urged lawmakers to reject the requested budget increase in a letter sent Friday.

ā€œIn 2022, agency data shows consumers reported losing almost $8.8 billion to scams… Despite this mounting caseload of fraud, identity theft and related cases, the FTC appears more interested in attacking U.S. tech companies, to the detriment of consumers who have benefitted from an unparalleled explosion of innovative, online-based products and services,ā€ CTA President Gary Shapiro wrote.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

Google CEO Promotes AI Regulation, GOP Urges TikTok Ban for Congress Members, States Join DOJ Antitrust Suit

Widespread AI applications could lead to a dramatic uptick in online disinformation, Pichai warned.

Published

on

Photo of Google CEO Sundar Pichai by the World Economic Forum used with permission

April 18, 2023 — Google CEO Sundar Pichai on Sunday called for increased regulation of artificial intelligence, warning that the rapidly developing technology poses broad societal risks.

ā€œThe pace at which we can think and adapt as societal institutions compared to the pace at which the technology’s evolving — there seems to be a mismatch,ā€ Pichai said in an interview with CBS News.

Watch Broadband Breakfast on April 26, 2023 – Should AI Be Regulated?
What are the risks associated with artificial intelligence deployment, and which concerns are just fearmongering?

Widespread AI applications could lead to a dramatic uptick in online disinformation, as it becomes increasingly easy to create and spread fake news, images and videos, Pichai warned.

Google recently released a series of recommendations for regulating AI, advocating for ā€œa sectoral approach that builds on existing regulationā€ and cautioning against ā€œover-reliance on human oversight as a solution to AI issues.ā€

But the directive also noted that ā€œwhile self-regulation is vital, it is not enough.ā€

Pichai emphasized this point, calling for broad multisector collaboration to best determine the shape of AI regulation.

ā€œThe development of this needs to include not just engineers, but social scientists, ethicists, philosophers and so on,ā€ he said. ā€œAnd I think these are all things society needs to figure out as we move along — it’s not for a company to decide.ā€

Republicans call to ban members of Congress from personal TikTok use

A group of Republican lawmakers on Monday urged the House and Senate rules committees to ban members of Congress from using TikTok, citing national security risks and the need to ā€œlead by example.ā€

Congress banned use of the app on government devices in late 2022, but several elected officials have maintained accounts on their personal devices.

In Monday’s letter, Republican lawmakers argued that the recent hearing featuring TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew made it ā€œblatantly clear to the public that the China-based app is mining data and potentially spying on American citizens.ā€

ā€œIt is troublesome that some members continue to disregard these clear warnings and are even encouraging their constituents to use TikTok to interface with their elected representatives – especially since some of these users are minors,ā€ the letter continued.

TikTok is facing hostility from the other side of the aisle as well. On Thursday, Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., sent Chew a list of questions about the app’s privacy and safety practices that House Democrats claimed were left unanswered at the March hearing.

Meanwhile, Montana lawmakers voted Friday to ban TikTok on all personal devices, becoming the first state to pass such legislation. The bill now awaits the signature of Gov. Greg Gianforte — who was one of several state leaders last year to mimic Congress in banning TikTok from government devices.

Nine additional states join DOJ’s antitrust lawsuit against Google

The Justice Department announced on Monday that nine additional states joined its antitrust lawsuit over Google’s alleged abuse of the digital advertising market.

The Attorneys General of Arizona, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Washington and West Virginia joined the existing coalition of California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee and Virginia.

ā€œWe look forward to litigating this important case alongside our state law enforcement partners to end Google’s long-running monopoly in digital advertising technology markets,ā€ said Doha Mekki, principal deputy assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division.

The lawsuit alleges that Google monopolizes digital advertising technologies used for both buying and selling ads, said Jonathan Kanter, assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, when the suit was filed in January.

ā€œOur complaint sets forth detailed allegations explaining how Google engaged in 15 years of sustained conduct that had — and continues to have — the effect of driving out rivals, diminishing competition, inflating advertising costs, reducing revenues for news publishers and content creators, snuffing out innovation, and harming the exchange of information and ideas in the public sphere,ā€ Kanter said.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

Panel Disagrees on Antitrust Bills’ Promotion of Competition

Panelists disagree on the effects of two antitrust bills intended to promote competition.

Published

on

Photo of Adam Kovacevich of Chamber of Progress, Berin Szoka of TechFreedom, Cheyenne Hunt-Majer of Public Citizen, Sacha Haworth of Tech Oversight Project, Christine Bannan of Proton (left to right)

WASHINGTON, March 10, 2023 – In a fiery debate Thursday, panelists at Broadband Breakfast’s Big Tech and Speech Summit disagreed on the effect of bills intended to promote competition and innovation in the Big Tech platform space, particularly for search engines. Ā 

One such innovation is new artificial intelligence technology being designed to pull everything a user searches for into a single page, said Cheyenne Hunt-Majer, big tech accountability advocate with Public Citizen. It is builtĀ to keep users on the site and will drastically change competition in theĀ search engine space, she said, touting the advancement of twoĀ bills currently awaiting Senate vote. Ā 

Photo of Adam Kovacevich of Chamber of Progress, Berin Szoka of TechFreedom, Cheyenne Hunt-Majer of Public Citizen, Sacha Haworth of Tech Oversight Project, Christine Bannan of Proton (left to right)

The first, the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, would prohibit tech companies from self-preferencing their own productsĀ on their platforms over third-party competition. The second, the Open App Markets Act, would prevent app stores from requiring private app developers to use the app stores’ in-app payment system.Ā 

Hunt-Majer said she believes that the bills would benefit consumers by kindling more innovation in big tech. ā€œPerfect should not be the enemy of change,ā€ she said, claiming that Congress must start somewhere, even if the bills are not perfect.Ā 

ā€œWe are seeing a jump ahead in a woefully unprepared system to face these issues and the issues it is going to pose for a healthy market of competition and innovation,ā€ said Hunt-Majer.Ā 

It is good for consumers to be able to find other ways to search that Google isn’t currently providing, agreed Christine Bannan, U.S. public policy manager atĀ privacy-focused email service Proton. The fundamental goal of these bills is directly at odds with big companies, which suggests its importance to curb anti-competitive behavior, she said.Ā 

No need to rewrite or draft new laws for competition

But while Berin Szoka, president of non-profit technology organization TechFreedom, said competition concerns are valid, the Federal Trade Commission is best equipped to deal with disputes without the need to rewrite or draft new laws. Congress must legislate carefully to avoid unintended consequences that fundamentally harm businesses and no legislation has done so to date, he said.Ā 

Both bills have broad anti-discrimination provisions which will affect Big Tech partnerships, Szoka continued.Ā 

Not all experts believe that AI will replace search engines, however. Google has already adopted specialized search results that directly answer search queries, such as math problems, instead of resulting in several links to related webpages, said Adam Kovacevich, CEO of Chamber of Progress, a center-left tech policy coalition. Ā 

Kovacevich said he believes that some search queries demand direct answers while others demand a wide range of sources, answers, and opinions. He predicts that there will be a market for both AI and traditional search engines like Google.Ā 

To watch the full videos join the Broadband Breakfast Club below.Ā We are currently offering a Free 30-Day Trial: No credit card required!

Continue Reading

Signup for Broadband Breakfast News



Broadband Breakfast Research Partner

Trending