Connect with us

Section 230

Defending Donald Trump Over Twitter, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Says President’s Attacks on Section 230 Are Constitutional

Published

on

Photo of Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr in February 2018 by Gage Skidmore used with permission

June 2, 2020 — Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr on Monday defended President Donald Trump’s attempts to punish Twitter’s fact-checking practices and said they were not in violation of the First Amendment.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects electronic forums like Twitter and Facebook from legal action if their users post defamatory content and also allows these web platforms to block material they deem lewd, violent, discriminatory or otherwise objectionable.

However, opponents of Section 230 argue that Twitter’s decision to post a fact check statement on one of Donald Trump’s tweets had voided Section 230’s “good faith” content review criteria.

“Everybody in this country, social media platforms, Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, you, me, we have free speech rights [and] Section 230 is not one of those,” Carr said.

The statement followed Trump’s Executive Order on Thursday to direct the Commerce Department to ask the FCC to re-evaluate Section 230. That move is likely to put the agency in a difficult spot considering that its Republican majority has cast itself as anti-regulatory.

However, Carr said that he has yet to be convinced by any legal argument that says that such a move by the agency would be overreaching, and that previous instances where the agency has declined to interfere in Section 230 were not applicable now.

“I think some of those prior statements that people have pointed to is a bit of a slight of hand,” he said.

Carr also said that such a move by the FCC has the potential to garner bipartisan support, given that former Vice President and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has also thrown his support behind repealing Section 230.

“I think that there’s a lot of potential actions that we could take here,” Carr said. “I do think that there is sort of broad bipartisan, if not consensus, concern, such that I have a hard time seeing the status quo holding.”

Elijah Labby was a Reporter with Broadband Breakfast. He was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and now resides in Orlando, Florida. He studies political science at Seminole State College, and enjoys reading and writing fiction (but not for Broadband Breakfast).

Section 230

Companies May Hesitate Bringing Section 230 Arguments in Court Fearing Political Ramifications: Lawyers

Legal experts say changing views on Section 230 will make platforms less willing to employ that defense in future cases.

Published

on

Carrie Goldberg, founder of C.A. Goldberg law firm

June 2, 2020 — Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr on Monday defended President Donald Trump’s attempts to punish Twitter’s fact-checking practices and said they were not in violation of the First Amendment.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects electronic forums like Twitter and Facebook from legal action if their users post defamatory content and also allows these web platforms to block material they deem lewd, violent, discriminatory or otherwise objectionable.

However, opponents of Section 230 argue that Twitter’s decision to post a fact check statement on one of Donald Trump’s tweets had voided Section 230’s “good faith” content review criteria.

“Everybody in this country, social media platforms, Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, you, me, we have free speech rights [and] Section 230 is not one of those,” Carr said.

The statement followed Trump’s Executive Order on Thursday to direct the Commerce Department to ask the FCC to re-evaluate Section 230. That move is likely to put the agency in a difficult spot considering that its Republican majority has cast itself as anti-regulatory.

However, Carr said that he has yet to be convinced by any legal argument that says that such a move by the agency would be overreaching, and that previous instances where the agency has declined to interfere in Section 230 were not applicable now.

“I think some of those prior statements that people have pointed to is a bit of a slight of hand,” he said.

Carr also said that such a move by the FCC has the potential to garner bipartisan support, given that former Vice President and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has also thrown his support behind repealing Section 230.

“I think that there’s a lot of potential actions that we could take here,” Carr said. “I do think that there is sort of broad bipartisan, if not consensus, concern, such that I have a hard time seeing the status quo holding.”

Continue Reading

Section 230

Head of Big Tech Lobby Group Says Repealing Section 230 Unconstitutional

CTA CEO said abolishing intermediary liability protections violates private industry protections against government interference.

Published

on

Gary Shapiro, CEO of the Consumer Technology Association

June 2, 2020 — Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr on Monday defended President Donald Trump’s attempts to punish Twitter’s fact-checking practices and said they were not in violation of the First Amendment.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects electronic forums like Twitter and Facebook from legal action if their users post defamatory content and also allows these web platforms to block material they deem lewd, violent, discriminatory or otherwise objectionable.

However, opponents of Section 230 argue that Twitter’s decision to post a fact check statement on one of Donald Trump’s tweets had voided Section 230’s “good faith” content review criteria.

“Everybody in this country, social media platforms, Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, you, me, we have free speech rights [and] Section 230 is not one of those,” Carr said.

The statement followed Trump’s Executive Order on Thursday to direct the Commerce Department to ask the FCC to re-evaluate Section 230. That move is likely to put the agency in a difficult spot considering that its Republican majority has cast itself as anti-regulatory.

However, Carr said that he has yet to be convinced by any legal argument that says that such a move by the agency would be overreaching, and that previous instances where the agency has declined to interfere in Section 230 were not applicable now.

“I think some of those prior statements that people have pointed to is a bit of a slight of hand,” he said.

Carr also said that such a move by the FCC has the potential to garner bipartisan support, given that former Vice President and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has also thrown his support behind repealing Section 230.

“I think that there’s a lot of potential actions that we could take here,” Carr said. “I do think that there is sort of broad bipartisan, if not consensus, concern, such that I have a hard time seeing the status quo holding.”

Continue Reading

Section 230

Broadband Breakfast Hosts Section 230 Debate

Two sets of experts debated the merits of reforming or removing and maintaining Section 230.

Published

on

Screenshot taken from Broadband Live Online event

June 2, 2020 — Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr on Monday defended President Donald Trump’s attempts to punish Twitter’s fact-checking practices and said they were not in violation of the First Amendment.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects electronic forums like Twitter and Facebook from legal action if their users post defamatory content and also allows these web platforms to block material they deem lewd, violent, discriminatory or otherwise objectionable.

However, opponents of Section 230 argue that Twitter’s decision to post a fact check statement on one of Donald Trump’s tweets had voided Section 230’s “good faith” content review criteria.

“Everybody in this country, social media platforms, Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, you, me, we have free speech rights [and] Section 230 is not one of those,” Carr said.

The statement followed Trump’s Executive Order on Thursday to direct the Commerce Department to ask the FCC to re-evaluate Section 230. That move is likely to put the agency in a difficult spot considering that its Republican majority has cast itself as anti-regulatory.

However, Carr said that he has yet to be convinced by any legal argument that says that such a move by the agency would be overreaching, and that previous instances where the agency has declined to interfere in Section 230 were not applicable now.

“I think some of those prior statements that people have pointed to is a bit of a slight of hand,” he said.

Carr also said that such a move by the FCC has the potential to garner bipartisan support, given that former Vice President and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has also thrown his support behind repealing Section 230.

“I think that there’s a lot of potential actions that we could take here,” Carr said. “I do think that there is sort of broad bipartisan, if not consensus, concern, such that I have a hard time seeing the status quo holding.”

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

 

Trending