Connect with us

Antitrust

Biden Administration and GOP Critics of Big Tech Create ‘Perfect Storm’ for Antitrust Action

Published

on

Screenshot from the webinar

October 13, 2020—A presidential administration led by Democratic Party presidential nominee Joe Biden would bring substantive changes to the enforcement of antitrust law, panelists predicted at a Brookings Institution event on October 6.

Bill Baer, an expert in antitrust law and visiting fellow of governance studies at Brookings the Institution,  recounted how surprised he was that so many Republicans actually supported greater antitrust enforcement.

Now, he said, they would actually allow law enforcement to go after abusive behavior and inappropriate acquisitions by large firms. Baer recently testified before the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee.

He predicted that this – with an election of Biden – might produce a “perfect storm” that would involve substantive changes to antitrust law for the first time since the early 1950s.

These issues will probably not be addressed till late spring or summer 2021. Though relevant, antitrust won’t be the first item on the docket of either a Biden administration or a new Trump administration. Still, Baer predicted that we may see legislative changes before law enforcement changes, which is very unusual, he said.

If Trump were elected, the Justice Department antitrust division will probably challenge Google and the Federal Trade Commission will probably challenge Facebook.

The latter would likely be a “hot potato” to be sorted out between the new head of the antitrust division and the new chair of the FTC, because even if a lawsuit were premature and on shaky grounds, there may still be a need for it, said Baer.

On predicting which administration would be friendlier to Silicon Valley, Nicol Turner Lee, senior fellow of governance studies and director of the Center for Technology Innovation at Brooking’s Institution, said that while Congress will ultimately determine which party dictates the agenda, an administration of Biden and Vice Presidential candidate Kamala Harris would have to do something to address the current perception that they are “cozy” with Silicon Valley companies.

Panelists agreed that if Biden won the election, passage of a federal privacy bill may be made more urgent. Turner Lee suggested that there may be structural changes with Harris looking at tech policies around hiring and discrimination, as well as improving algorithmic accountability.

Alex Engler, Rubenstein fellow of governance studies at Brooking’s Institution, predicted that Biden would probably try to push for regulation of facial recognition and systems for bail release, while Trump would be unlikely to address these things.

Engler also predicted that under Biden, changes to Section 230 would likely be more incremental, saying “It’s not just keep it or scrap it.”

Turner Lee agreed with Engler, and added that often people don’t think about if the social media problems they’re facing are due to Section 230, algorithmic amplification or something else.

Alexandra Levine, technology reporter at Politico, moderated the session.

Reporter Liana Sowa grew up in Simsbury, Connecticut. She studied editing and publishing as a writing fellow at Brigham Young University, where she mentored upperclassmen on neuroscience research papers. She enjoys reading and journaling, and marathon-runnning and stilt-walking.

Antitrust

Explainer: Antitrust Heats Up as Biden Selects Tech Critic Jonathan Kanter for Top Enforcement Spot

In the fourth in a series of explainers, Broadband Breakfast examines the Biden administration’s intent to bash Big Tech.

Published

on

Photo of Jonathan Kanter at the Capitol Forum by New America used with permission

October 13, 2020—A presidential administration led by Democratic Party presidential nominee Joe Biden would bring substantive changes to the enforcement of antitrust law, panelists predicted at a Brookings Institution event on October 6.

Bill Baer, an expert in antitrust law and visiting fellow of governance studies at Brookings the Institution,  recounted how surprised he was that so many Republicans actually supported greater antitrust enforcement.

Now, he said, they would actually allow law enforcement to go after abusive behavior and inappropriate acquisitions by large firms. Baer recently testified before the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee.

He predicted that this – with an election of Biden – might produce a “perfect storm” that would involve substantive changes to antitrust law for the first time since the early 1950s.

These issues will probably not be addressed till late spring or summer 2021. Though relevant, antitrust won’t be the first item on the docket of either a Biden administration or a new Trump administration. Still, Baer predicted that we may see legislative changes before law enforcement changes, which is very unusual, he said.

If Trump were elected, the Justice Department antitrust division will probably challenge Google and the Federal Trade Commission will probably challenge Facebook.

The latter would likely be a “hot potato” to be sorted out between the new head of the antitrust division and the new chair of the FTC, because even if a lawsuit were premature and on shaky grounds, there may still be a need for it, said Baer.

On predicting which administration would be friendlier to Silicon Valley, Nicol Turner Lee, senior fellow of governance studies and director of the Center for Technology Innovation at Brooking’s Institution, said that while Congress will ultimately determine which party dictates the agenda, an administration of Biden and Vice Presidential candidate Kamala Harris would have to do something to address the current perception that they are “cozy” with Silicon Valley companies.

Panelists agreed that if Biden won the election, passage of a federal privacy bill may be made more urgent. Turner Lee suggested that there may be structural changes with Harris looking at tech policies around hiring and discrimination, as well as improving algorithmic accountability.

Alex Engler, Rubenstein fellow of governance studies at Brooking’s Institution, predicted that Biden would probably try to push for regulation of facial recognition and systems for bail release, while Trump would be unlikely to address these things.

Engler also predicted that under Biden, changes to Section 230 would likely be more incremental, saying “It’s not just keep it or scrap it.”

Turner Lee agreed with Engler, and added that often people don’t think about if the social media problems they’re facing are due to Section 230, algorithmic amplification or something else.

Alexandra Levine, technology reporter at Politico, moderated the session.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

Federal Trade Commission Expands Antitrust Enforcement By Rescinding Obama-Era Policy

In a party-line vote, the agency rescinded a 2015 statement that limited the scope of antitrust enforcement.

Published

on

Photo of FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan.

October 13, 2020—A presidential administration led by Democratic Party presidential nominee Joe Biden would bring substantive changes to the enforcement of antitrust law, panelists predicted at a Brookings Institution event on October 6.

Bill Baer, an expert in antitrust law and visiting fellow of governance studies at Brookings the Institution,  recounted how surprised he was that so many Republicans actually supported greater antitrust enforcement.

Now, he said, they would actually allow law enforcement to go after abusive behavior and inappropriate acquisitions by large firms. Baer recently testified before the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee.

He predicted that this – with an election of Biden – might produce a “perfect storm” that would involve substantive changes to antitrust law for the first time since the early 1950s.

These issues will probably not be addressed till late spring or summer 2021. Though relevant, antitrust won’t be the first item on the docket of either a Biden administration or a new Trump administration. Still, Baer predicted that we may see legislative changes before law enforcement changes, which is very unusual, he said.

If Trump were elected, the Justice Department antitrust division will probably challenge Google and the Federal Trade Commission will probably challenge Facebook.

The latter would likely be a “hot potato” to be sorted out between the new head of the antitrust division and the new chair of the FTC, because even if a lawsuit were premature and on shaky grounds, there may still be a need for it, said Baer.

On predicting which administration would be friendlier to Silicon Valley, Nicol Turner Lee, senior fellow of governance studies and director of the Center for Technology Innovation at Brooking’s Institution, said that while Congress will ultimately determine which party dictates the agenda, an administration of Biden and Vice Presidential candidate Kamala Harris would have to do something to address the current perception that they are “cozy” with Silicon Valley companies.

Panelists agreed that if Biden won the election, passage of a federal privacy bill may be made more urgent. Turner Lee suggested that there may be structural changes with Harris looking at tech policies around hiring and discrimination, as well as improving algorithmic accountability.

Alex Engler, Rubenstein fellow of governance studies at Brooking’s Institution, predicted that Biden would probably try to push for regulation of facial recognition and systems for bail release, while Trump would be unlikely to address these things.

Engler also predicted that under Biden, changes to Section 230 would likely be more incremental, saying “It’s not just keep it or scrap it.”

Turner Lee agreed with Engler, and added that often people don’t think about if the social media problems they’re facing are due to Section 230, algorithmic amplification or something else.

Alexandra Levine, technology reporter at Politico, moderated the session.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

Experts Disagree Over Need, Feasibility of Global Standards for Antitrust Rules

Legal experts and economists disagreed over the feasibility and necessity of a global standard for antitrust enforcement.

Published

on

Aurelien Portuese of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

October 13, 2020—A presidential administration led by Democratic Party presidential nominee Joe Biden would bring substantive changes to the enforcement of antitrust law, panelists predicted at a Brookings Institution event on October 6.

Bill Baer, an expert in antitrust law and visiting fellow of governance studies at Brookings the Institution,  recounted how surprised he was that so many Republicans actually supported greater antitrust enforcement.

Now, he said, they would actually allow law enforcement to go after abusive behavior and inappropriate acquisitions by large firms. Baer recently testified before the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee.

He predicted that this – with an election of Biden – might produce a “perfect storm” that would involve substantive changes to antitrust law for the first time since the early 1950s.

These issues will probably not be addressed till late spring or summer 2021. Though relevant, antitrust won’t be the first item on the docket of either a Biden administration or a new Trump administration. Still, Baer predicted that we may see legislative changes before law enforcement changes, which is very unusual, he said.

If Trump were elected, the Justice Department antitrust division will probably challenge Google and the Federal Trade Commission will probably challenge Facebook.

The latter would likely be a “hot potato” to be sorted out between the new head of the antitrust division and the new chair of the FTC, because even if a lawsuit were premature and on shaky grounds, there may still be a need for it, said Baer.

On predicting which administration would be friendlier to Silicon Valley, Nicol Turner Lee, senior fellow of governance studies and director of the Center for Technology Innovation at Brooking’s Institution, said that while Congress will ultimately determine which party dictates the agenda, an administration of Biden and Vice Presidential candidate Kamala Harris would have to do something to address the current perception that they are “cozy” with Silicon Valley companies.

Panelists agreed that if Biden won the election, passage of a federal privacy bill may be made more urgent. Turner Lee suggested that there may be structural changes with Harris looking at tech policies around hiring and discrimination, as well as improving algorithmic accountability.

Alex Engler, Rubenstein fellow of governance studies at Brooking’s Institution, predicted that Biden would probably try to push for regulation of facial recognition and systems for bail release, while Trump would be unlikely to address these things.

Engler also predicted that under Biden, changes to Section 230 would likely be more incremental, saying “It’s not just keep it or scrap it.”

Turner Lee agreed with Engler, and added that often people don’t think about if the social media problems they’re facing are due to Section 230, algorithmic amplification or something else.

Alexandra Levine, technology reporter at Politico, moderated the session.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

 

Trending