Connect with us

Antitrust

House Democratic Report Proposes ‘Structural Separation’ of Big Tech, GOP Minority Report Wants to Gut Section 230

Published

on

Phot of subcommittee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio

October 11, 2020 — House Democrats on Tuesday proposed a massive overhaul of U.S. antitrust laws that could make it easier to break up giant tech companies.

If elements of the 449-page proposal are implemented in legislation, it could be a profound re-writing of the relationship between Big Tech and Washington. New rules would restrict the lines of business in which dominant multi-sided digital platforms could operate.

The report, by the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee, is the culmination of a 16-month investigation into the practices of Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon. It lays out a number of concrete antitrust policy recommendations.

In particular, the report says, Congress should force a “structural separations” of operations within the respective companies.

For example, among the proposals include a ban on tech platforms acquiring future startups or potential rivals. In the case of Amazon, the proposals would bar it from both owning and selling products on an e-commerce hub. Both of those proposals were made with only Democratic support.

Republicans did not support those proposals. Later on Tuesday, the Republican minority committee staff published a separate report entitled, “Reigning in Big Tech’s Censorship of Conservatives.”

In the GOP report, Judiciary Republicans called for revamping the liability protections that shield Facebook, Twitter and other internet companies, or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The Republicans want to open Big Tech up to lawsuits from which they are currently immune.

But there was bipartisan support on the committee for providing new resources to federal antitrust enforcement. Republicans also favor making it easier for officials at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission to “shift the burden of proof” on what makes up an anti-competitive acquisition.

One of the main suggestions calls for Congress to define a new standard for antitrust violations, and enact laws “designed to protect not just consumers, but also workers, entrepreneurs, independent businesses, open markets, a fair economy, and democratic ideals.”

Representative Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary committee, said: “Big tech is out to get conservatives. Unfortunately, the Democrats’ partisan report ignores this fundamental problem and potential solutions and instead advances radical proposals that would refashion antitrust law in the vision of the far left.”

Tech companies defended their business practices and touted the popularity of their services among consumers in statements in response to the committee’s reports.

Meanwhile, the Democratic report received praise from consumer advocates and representatives for companies and industries who say they have been harmed by Silicon Valley giants’ anti-competitive conduct.

The next step will be for legislators to turn the recommendations to legislation. Subcommittee Chairman David Cicilline, D-R.I., has discussed plans for action, and said, “In the coming weeks and months, we will have an opportunity to further explore these remedies.”

“I am hopeful that, with Joe Biden in the White House, we will finally end this monopoly moment and restore a free and open internet,” said Cicilline, indicating that the effort may require a Democratic win of the presidency in November to progress.

Former Assistant Editor Jericho Casper graduated from the University of Virginia studying media policy. She grew up in Newport News in an area heavily impacted by the digital divide. She has a passion for universal access and a vendetta against anyone who stands in the way of her getting better broadband. She is now Associate Broadband Researcher at the Institute for Local Self Reliance's Community Broadband Network Initiative.

Antitrust

FTC Divided Over Increasing Agency Jurisdiction at Congressional Hearing

FTC commissioners were split at a Congressional hearing on Wednesday at the prospects of increasing FTC jurisdiction.

Published

on

Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Illinois.

October 11, 2020 — House Democrats on Tuesday proposed a massive overhaul of U.S. antitrust laws that could make it easier to break up giant tech companies.

If elements of the 449-page proposal are implemented in legislation, it could be a profound re-writing of the relationship between Big Tech and Washington. New rules would restrict the lines of business in which dominant multi-sided digital platforms could operate.

The report, by the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee, is the culmination of a 16-month investigation into the practices of Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon. It lays out a number of concrete antitrust policy recommendations.

In particular, the report says, Congress should force a “structural separations” of operations within the respective companies.

For example, among the proposals include a ban on tech platforms acquiring future startups or potential rivals. In the case of Amazon, the proposals would bar it from both owning and selling products on an e-commerce hub. Both of those proposals were made with only Democratic support.

Republicans did not support those proposals. Later on Tuesday, the Republican minority committee staff published a separate report entitled, “Reigning in Big Tech’s Censorship of Conservatives.”

In the GOP report, Judiciary Republicans called for revamping the liability protections that shield Facebook, Twitter and other internet companies, or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The Republicans want to open Big Tech up to lawsuits from which they are currently immune.

But there was bipartisan support on the committee for providing new resources to federal antitrust enforcement. Republicans also favor making it easier for officials at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission to “shift the burden of proof” on what makes up an anti-competitive acquisition.

One of the main suggestions calls for Congress to define a new standard for antitrust violations, and enact laws “designed to protect not just consumers, but also workers, entrepreneurs, independent businesses, open markets, a fair economy, and democratic ideals.”

Representative Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary committee, said: “Big tech is out to get conservatives. Unfortunately, the Democrats’ partisan report ignores this fundamental problem and potential solutions and instead advances radical proposals that would refashion antitrust law in the vision of the far left.”

Tech companies defended their business practices and touted the popularity of their services among consumers in statements in response to the committee’s reports.

Meanwhile, the Democratic report received praise from consumer advocates and representatives for companies and industries who say they have been harmed by Silicon Valley giants’ anti-competitive conduct.

The next step will be for legislators to turn the recommendations to legislation. Subcommittee Chairman David Cicilline, D-R.I., has discussed plans for action, and said, “In the coming weeks and months, we will have an opportunity to further explore these remedies.”

“I am hopeful that, with Joe Biden in the White House, we will finally end this monopoly moment and restore a free and open internet,” said Cicilline, indicating that the effort may require a Democratic win of the presidency in November to progress.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

Explainer: Antitrust Heats Up as Biden Selects Tech Critic Jonathan Kanter for Top Enforcement Spot

In the fourth in a series of explainers, Broadband Breakfast examines the Biden administration’s intent to bash Big Tech.

Published

on

Photo of Jonathan Kanter at the Capitol Forum by New America used with permission

October 11, 2020 — House Democrats on Tuesday proposed a massive overhaul of U.S. antitrust laws that could make it easier to break up giant tech companies.

If elements of the 449-page proposal are implemented in legislation, it could be a profound re-writing of the relationship between Big Tech and Washington. New rules would restrict the lines of business in which dominant multi-sided digital platforms could operate.

The report, by the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee, is the culmination of a 16-month investigation into the practices of Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon. It lays out a number of concrete antitrust policy recommendations.

In particular, the report says, Congress should force a “structural separations” of operations within the respective companies.

For example, among the proposals include a ban on tech platforms acquiring future startups or potential rivals. In the case of Amazon, the proposals would bar it from both owning and selling products on an e-commerce hub. Both of those proposals were made with only Democratic support.

Republicans did not support those proposals. Later on Tuesday, the Republican minority committee staff published a separate report entitled, “Reigning in Big Tech’s Censorship of Conservatives.”

In the GOP report, Judiciary Republicans called for revamping the liability protections that shield Facebook, Twitter and other internet companies, or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The Republicans want to open Big Tech up to lawsuits from which they are currently immune.

But there was bipartisan support on the committee for providing new resources to federal antitrust enforcement. Republicans also favor making it easier for officials at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission to “shift the burden of proof” on what makes up an anti-competitive acquisition.

One of the main suggestions calls for Congress to define a new standard for antitrust violations, and enact laws “designed to protect not just consumers, but also workers, entrepreneurs, independent businesses, open markets, a fair economy, and democratic ideals.”

Representative Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary committee, said: “Big tech is out to get conservatives. Unfortunately, the Democrats’ partisan report ignores this fundamental problem and potential solutions and instead advances radical proposals that would refashion antitrust law in the vision of the far left.”

Tech companies defended their business practices and touted the popularity of their services among consumers in statements in response to the committee’s reports.

Meanwhile, the Democratic report received praise from consumer advocates and representatives for companies and industries who say they have been harmed by Silicon Valley giants’ anti-competitive conduct.

The next step will be for legislators to turn the recommendations to legislation. Subcommittee Chairman David Cicilline, D-R.I., has discussed plans for action, and said, “In the coming weeks and months, we will have an opportunity to further explore these remedies.”

“I am hopeful that, with Joe Biden in the White House, we will finally end this monopoly moment and restore a free and open internet,” said Cicilline, indicating that the effort may require a Democratic win of the presidency in November to progress.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

Federal Trade Commission Expands Antitrust Enforcement By Rescinding Obama-Era Policy

In a party-line vote, the agency rescinded a 2015 statement that limited the scope of antitrust enforcement.

Published

on

Photo of FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan.

October 11, 2020 — House Democrats on Tuesday proposed a massive overhaul of U.S. antitrust laws that could make it easier to break up giant tech companies.

If elements of the 449-page proposal are implemented in legislation, it could be a profound re-writing of the relationship between Big Tech and Washington. New rules would restrict the lines of business in which dominant multi-sided digital platforms could operate.

The report, by the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee, is the culmination of a 16-month investigation into the practices of Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon. It lays out a number of concrete antitrust policy recommendations.

In particular, the report says, Congress should force a “structural separations” of operations within the respective companies.

For example, among the proposals include a ban on tech platforms acquiring future startups or potential rivals. In the case of Amazon, the proposals would bar it from both owning and selling products on an e-commerce hub. Both of those proposals were made with only Democratic support.

Republicans did not support those proposals. Later on Tuesday, the Republican minority committee staff published a separate report entitled, “Reigning in Big Tech’s Censorship of Conservatives.”

In the GOP report, Judiciary Republicans called for revamping the liability protections that shield Facebook, Twitter and other internet companies, or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The Republicans want to open Big Tech up to lawsuits from which they are currently immune.

But there was bipartisan support on the committee for providing new resources to federal antitrust enforcement. Republicans also favor making it easier for officials at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission to “shift the burden of proof” on what makes up an anti-competitive acquisition.

One of the main suggestions calls for Congress to define a new standard for antitrust violations, and enact laws “designed to protect not just consumers, but also workers, entrepreneurs, independent businesses, open markets, a fair economy, and democratic ideals.”

Representative Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary committee, said: “Big tech is out to get conservatives. Unfortunately, the Democrats’ partisan report ignores this fundamental problem and potential solutions and instead advances radical proposals that would refashion antitrust law in the vision of the far left.”

Tech companies defended their business practices and touted the popularity of their services among consumers in statements in response to the committee’s reports.

Meanwhile, the Democratic report received praise from consumer advocates and representatives for companies and industries who say they have been harmed by Silicon Valley giants’ anti-competitive conduct.

The next step will be for legislators to turn the recommendations to legislation. Subcommittee Chairman David Cicilline, D-R.I., has discussed plans for action, and said, “In the coming weeks and months, we will have an opportunity to further explore these remedies.”

“I am hopeful that, with Joe Biden in the White House, we will finally end this monopoly moment and restore a free and open internet,” said Cicilline, indicating that the effort may require a Democratic win of the presidency in November to progress.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

 

Trending