Connect with us

Section 230

Head of Big Tech Lobby Group Says Repealing Section 230 Unconstitutional

CTA CEO said abolishing intermediary liability protections violates private industry protections against government interference.

Published

on

Gary Shapiro, CEO of the Consumer Technology Association

June 23, 2021— Gary Shapiro, the CEO of the Consumer Technology Association, said at a conference Tuesday that while social media platforms have responsibilities to the public, repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects social media platforms from legal responsibility for the third-party content posted to their website.

Countering the philosophy that Section 230 should be repealed, Shapiro – whose trade organization represents Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft — said at the conference hosted by the Media Institute that doing so would not only destroy the value of these platforms but would blatantly contradict the U.S.’s value of free speech.

Shapiro reasoned that the free speech protected by the Constitution applies specifically to government, not private industry. He said Congress, specifically, cannot interfere with free speech, and that repealing Section 230 would do just that for private companies.

“If Yelp is responsible for user reviews, if Next Door is responsible for a neighbor’s critical comments, or if Facebook is responsible for political comments, not only are we making these services essentially unusable, we are trampling on the free expression values we treasure, that are embodied in our constitution.”

Despite speculation about the future of Section 230, including what Congress will do about proposed amendments to it, Republican party members, including Bob Latta, R-Ohio, have said that they believe Section 230 is here to stay.

Shapiro said that while the government should not get involved in how platforms moderate their content, social media companies still have a responsibility to foster free speech and healthy discourse in the public sphere. He said while moderating content is their constitutionally protected right, banning former President Donald Trump was “over the line” and irresponsible.

Shapiro accused both political parties of wanting to make platforms legally responsible for content posted to their website.

“This is like making hotel owners responsible for guests’ behavior,” he said. “Creating this liability, given the huge amount of posting, would severely crimp the value of these services and lead to an onslaught of opportunistic trial-lawyer lawsuits.”

Big tech and antitrust

During the conference, Shapiro also spoke out against the antitrust bills currently proposed in the House, calling them “weird and dangerous.” He said the bills were rushed through Congress without proper hearings because the bills are politically motivated and have less to do with consumer welfare than they are about retaliating against social media companies.

“As currently drafted, the package of antitrust bills introduced in the House Judiciary Committee would be a disaster for American innovators and consumers,” Shapiro said in a separate press release. “If signed into law, the bills would cause irreparable harm to small businesses and startups and put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage against China.”

Editor’s Note: The Consumer Technology Association followed up with us to note that Gary Shapiro did not use the world “unconstitutional” in his speech. They did not object to Broadband Breakfast’s reporting that Shapiro said that repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections. Therefore, Broadband Breakfast stands by its original story.

Reporter Tyler Perkins studied rhetoric and English literature, and also economics and mathematics, at the University of Utah. Although he grew up in and never left the West (both Oregon and Utah) until recently, he intends to study law and build a career on the East Coast. In his free time, he enjoys reading excellent literature and playing poor golf.

Section 230

Companies May Hesitate Bringing Section 230 Arguments in Court Fearing Political Ramifications: Lawyers

Legal experts say changing views on Section 230 will make platforms less willing to employ that defense in future cases.

Published

on

Carrie Goldberg, founder of C.A. Goldberg law firm

June 23, 2021— Gary Shapiro, the CEO of the Consumer Technology Association, said at a conference Tuesday that while social media platforms have responsibilities to the public, repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects social media platforms from legal responsibility for the third-party content posted to their website.

Countering the philosophy that Section 230 should be repealed, Shapiro – whose trade organization represents Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft — said at the conference hosted by the Media Institute that doing so would not only destroy the value of these platforms but would blatantly contradict the U.S.’s value of free speech.

Shapiro reasoned that the free speech protected by the Constitution applies specifically to government, not private industry. He said Congress, specifically, cannot interfere with free speech, and that repealing Section 230 would do just that for private companies.

“If Yelp is responsible for user reviews, if Next Door is responsible for a neighbor’s critical comments, or if Facebook is responsible for political comments, not only are we making these services essentially unusable, we are trampling on the free expression values we treasure, that are embodied in our constitution.”

Despite speculation about the future of Section 230, including what Congress will do about proposed amendments to it, Republican party members, including Bob Latta, R-Ohio, have said that they believe Section 230 is here to stay.

Shapiro said that while the government should not get involved in how platforms moderate their content, social media companies still have a responsibility to foster free speech and healthy discourse in the public sphere. He said while moderating content is their constitutionally protected right, banning former President Donald Trump was “over the line” and irresponsible.

Shapiro accused both political parties of wanting to make platforms legally responsible for content posted to their website.

“This is like making hotel owners responsible for guests’ behavior,” he said. “Creating this liability, given the huge amount of posting, would severely crimp the value of these services and lead to an onslaught of opportunistic trial-lawyer lawsuits.”

Big tech and antitrust

During the conference, Shapiro also spoke out against the antitrust bills currently proposed in the House, calling them “weird and dangerous.” He said the bills were rushed through Congress without proper hearings because the bills are politically motivated and have less to do with consumer welfare than they are about retaliating against social media companies.

“As currently drafted, the package of antitrust bills introduced in the House Judiciary Committee would be a disaster for American innovators and consumers,” Shapiro said in a separate press release. “If signed into law, the bills would cause irreparable harm to small businesses and startups and put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage against China.”

Editor’s Note: The Consumer Technology Association followed up with us to note that Gary Shapiro did not use the world “unconstitutional” in his speech. They did not object to Broadband Breakfast’s reporting that Shapiro said that repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections. Therefore, Broadband Breakfast stands by its original story.

Continue Reading

Section 230

Broadband Breakfast Hosts Section 230 Debate

Two sets of experts debated the merits of reforming or removing and maintaining Section 230.

Published

on

Screenshot taken from Broadband Live Online event

June 23, 2021— Gary Shapiro, the CEO of the Consumer Technology Association, said at a conference Tuesday that while social media platforms have responsibilities to the public, repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects social media platforms from legal responsibility for the third-party content posted to their website.

Countering the philosophy that Section 230 should be repealed, Shapiro – whose trade organization represents Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft — said at the conference hosted by the Media Institute that doing so would not only destroy the value of these platforms but would blatantly contradict the U.S.’s value of free speech.

Shapiro reasoned that the free speech protected by the Constitution applies specifically to government, not private industry. He said Congress, specifically, cannot interfere with free speech, and that repealing Section 230 would do just that for private companies.

“If Yelp is responsible for user reviews, if Next Door is responsible for a neighbor’s critical comments, or if Facebook is responsible for political comments, not only are we making these services essentially unusable, we are trampling on the free expression values we treasure, that are embodied in our constitution.”

Despite speculation about the future of Section 230, including what Congress will do about proposed amendments to it, Republican party members, including Bob Latta, R-Ohio, have said that they believe Section 230 is here to stay.

Shapiro said that while the government should not get involved in how platforms moderate their content, social media companies still have a responsibility to foster free speech and healthy discourse in the public sphere. He said while moderating content is their constitutionally protected right, banning former President Donald Trump was “over the line” and irresponsible.

Shapiro accused both political parties of wanting to make platforms legally responsible for content posted to their website.

“This is like making hotel owners responsible for guests’ behavior,” he said. “Creating this liability, given the huge amount of posting, would severely crimp the value of these services and lead to an onslaught of opportunistic trial-lawyer lawsuits.”

Big tech and antitrust

During the conference, Shapiro also spoke out against the antitrust bills currently proposed in the House, calling them “weird and dangerous.” He said the bills were rushed through Congress without proper hearings because the bills are politically motivated and have less to do with consumer welfare than they are about retaliating against social media companies.

“As currently drafted, the package of antitrust bills introduced in the House Judiciary Committee would be a disaster for American innovators and consumers,” Shapiro said in a separate press release. “If signed into law, the bills would cause irreparable harm to small businesses and startups and put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage against China.”

Editor’s Note: The Consumer Technology Association followed up with us to note that Gary Shapiro did not use the world “unconstitutional” in his speech. They did not object to Broadband Breakfast’s reporting that Shapiro said that repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections. Therefore, Broadband Breakfast stands by its original story.

Continue Reading

Section 230

Despite Speculation, Section 230 Is Here to Stay: Rep. Bob Latta

Republican representative Bob Latta said Section 230 is not going anywhere anytime soon.

Published

on

Republican Rep. for Ohio Bob Latta

June 23, 2021— Gary Shapiro, the CEO of the Consumer Technology Association, said at a conference Tuesday that while social media platforms have responsibilities to the public, repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects social media platforms from legal responsibility for the third-party content posted to their website.

Countering the philosophy that Section 230 should be repealed, Shapiro – whose trade organization represents Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft — said at the conference hosted by the Media Institute that doing so would not only destroy the value of these platforms but would blatantly contradict the U.S.’s value of free speech.

Shapiro reasoned that the free speech protected by the Constitution applies specifically to government, not private industry. He said Congress, specifically, cannot interfere with free speech, and that repealing Section 230 would do just that for private companies.

“If Yelp is responsible for user reviews, if Next Door is responsible for a neighbor’s critical comments, or if Facebook is responsible for political comments, not only are we making these services essentially unusable, we are trampling on the free expression values we treasure, that are embodied in our constitution.”

Despite speculation about the future of Section 230, including what Congress will do about proposed amendments to it, Republican party members, including Bob Latta, R-Ohio, have said that they believe Section 230 is here to stay.

Shapiro said that while the government should not get involved in how platforms moderate their content, social media companies still have a responsibility to foster free speech and healthy discourse in the public sphere. He said while moderating content is their constitutionally protected right, banning former President Donald Trump was “over the line” and irresponsible.

Shapiro accused both political parties of wanting to make platforms legally responsible for content posted to their website.

“This is like making hotel owners responsible for guests’ behavior,” he said. “Creating this liability, given the huge amount of posting, would severely crimp the value of these services and lead to an onslaught of opportunistic trial-lawyer lawsuits.”

Big tech and antitrust

During the conference, Shapiro also spoke out against the antitrust bills currently proposed in the House, calling them “weird and dangerous.” He said the bills were rushed through Congress without proper hearings because the bills are politically motivated and have less to do with consumer welfare than they are about retaliating against social media companies.

“As currently drafted, the package of antitrust bills introduced in the House Judiciary Committee would be a disaster for American innovators and consumers,” Shapiro said in a separate press release. “If signed into law, the bills would cause irreparable harm to small businesses and startups and put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage against China.”

Editor’s Note: The Consumer Technology Association followed up with us to note that Gary Shapiro did not use the world “unconstitutional” in his speech. They did not object to Broadband Breakfast’s reporting that Shapiro said that repealing Section 230 would violate the Constitution’s free-speech protections. Therefore, Broadband Breakfast stands by its original story.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

 

Trending