House lawmakers presented a united front against TikTok as calls for a national ban gain momentum.
People will migrate from platforms with too stringent content moderation measures.
The law prevents discussion on how the first amendment should be applied in a new age of technology, says expert.
Private institutions may become primary method for content moderation disputes, says expert.
Experts urged Congress to amend tech protection law to limit protection for the promotion of harmful information.
Our comprehensive report examines the extremely timely issue of content moderation and Section 230 from multiple angles.
Reforming Section 230 may not ‘break the internet,’ but experts recommended that changes be targeted and incremental.
The “Project Texas” initiative ensures that all of TikTok’s U.S. data security operations are overseen by independent parties.
Panelists discussed the recent oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google.
Many of the arguments in Twitter v. Taamneh hinged on specific interpretations of the Anti-Terrorism Act.
Conservative podcasters were 11 times more likely than liberal podcasters to share claims fact-checked as false.
During oral arguments for Gonzalez v. Google, justices repeatedly voiced concerns about potential unintended consequences.
Bills ranged from addressing intermediary liability to limiting personal data collection.
Two Republican-led states sued the Biden administration over alleged collusion with tech companies.
With millions of pieces of content generated daily, platforms are increasingly relying on AI for moderation.
Court decisions on Texas and Florida “must-carry” laws disagreed on whether online platforms should be regulated as common carriers.
Panelists disagreed over the merits of Section 230’s protections and the extent to which they apply.
The court has not yet agreed to hear the cases, but multiple justices have commented on their importance.
Campus TikTok bans could have negative consequences for students.
'Section 230 is critical to enabling the digital sector’s efforts to respond to extremist[s],' said a tech industry supporter.
Without Section 230, platforms whose actions are legally justified could be subject to ruinous lawsuits.
When the influencer is given freedom to shape the advertisements, her followers will perceive the campaign as authentic.
The Supreme Court is preparing to hear two cases related to content moderation and platform liability.
Lack of enforcement has led to gray area surrounding endorsement advertising, especially from 'microcelebrities.'
The Supreme Court's decision could dramatically alter the content moderation landscape.
Transparency laws in Calif. and N.Y. are the 'liberal' counterpart to the 'conservative' speech laws in Texas and Florida.
The merger, delayed by a federal probe, has left Truth Social without expected funding.
The current kerfufle isn't the first time Twitter has had a run-in with the Federal Trade Commission.
Georgetown University professor Randy Barnett said that the ability to post on social media might be a civil right.
Some agreed there is egregious information that should be downranked on search platforms.
One professor said it is the only way to solve the harmful content problem without encroaching on free speech rights.
Observers on a Broadband Breakfast panel offered differing perspectives on the high court's decision.
The decision resulted in an unusual court split. Justice Kagan sided with Justice Alito but refused to sign his dissent.
Parler's Amy Peikoff said she wishes Twitter can follow in her social media company's footsteps.
The debate on what government should -- or shouldn't -- do with respect to liability protections for platforms continues.
Carr said he’s “very glad to hear” of Musk’s Twitter purchase, but still thinks Section 230 reform is necessary.
Will Twitter's new owner change the debate about social media?
Columbia University researcher shared her perspectives at event hosted by The Atlantic that featured former President Barack Obama.
Government is 'worst person' to manage content moderation.
Senator Edward Markey has been a proponent of increasing the age group in child privacy laws for years.
