> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://broadbandbreakfast.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# House Democrats Fight Against Anti-Crypto Measures in Senate-Passed Infrastructure Bill
- URL: https://broadbandbreakfast.com/house-democrats-fight-against-anti-crypto-measures-in-senate-passed-infrastructure-bill/
- Published: 2021-08-21T00:17:55.000Z
- Updated: 2026-03-11T06:18:57.000Z
- Description: August 20, 2021 – Pro-crypto House Democrats pushed back against the Senate Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act’s inclusion of crypto regulatory language, seeking to make it less broad. The additions of cryptocurrency taxes aim to generate revenue to pay for part of the infrastructure spending. I
- Author: Uhunoma Edamwen
- Tags: Infrastructure, Congress, #broadband, Anna Eshoo, Bill Foster, Darren Soto, Eric Swalwell, House, infrastructure and investment act, Public Knowledge, Ro Khanna, #wp, #wp-post, #Import 2024-02-01 10:16, #added-preview-divider

August 20, 2021 – Pro-crypto House Democrats pushed back against the [Senate Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act’s](https://broadbandbreakfast.com/infrastructure-bill-goes-to-house-senators-add-crypto-regs-apple-tool-to-scan-for-child-abuse/) inclusion of crypto regulatory language, seeking to make it less broad.

The additions of cryptocurrency taxes aim to generate revenue to pay for part of the infrastructure spending. Its authors intended to reduce fraud in reports to the IRS.

Democratic California Reps. **Ro Khanna**, **Eric Swalwell**, and **Anna Eshoo** [joined cryptocurrency enthusiasts](https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/13/crypto-house-democrats-tax-fight-504341?ref=broadbandbreakfast.com) Rep. **Bill Foster**, D-Illinois, and Rep. **Darren Soto**, D-Fla., in urging to amend the infrastructure bill in the House.

In a letter released on August 12, Eshoo [advocated](https://eshoo.house.gov/sites/eshoo.house.gov/files/Aug12%5FCrypto.pdf?ref=broadbandbreakfast.com) to Pelosi that the House should “amend the problematic broker definition,” describing the existing language as “imposing unworkable regulations.”

But there is some feeling that amendments to the bill in the House may not be necessary. [According to a Treasury Department](https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/16/tax-foundation-infrastructure-bill-crypto-tax-provision-is-unworkable.html?ref=broadbandbreakfast.com) official, the agency plans to clarify its definition of a “broker” to be more specific.

Any amendments to the House would force the infrastructure measure back to the Senate.