> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://broadbandbreakfast.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Supreme Court Upholds Universal Service Fund, 6-3
- URL: https://broadbandbreakfast.com/supreme-court-upholds-universal-service-fund-6-3/
- Published: 2025-06-27T15:00:49.000Z
- Updated: 2026-03-11T05:51:06.000Z
- Description: The court said the contribution scheme and management were Constitutional.
- Author: Jake Neenan
- Tags: Supreme Court, FCC, USF, Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, #with-siderail

WASHINGTON, June 27, 2025 – The Supreme Court on Friday overturned a Fifth Circuit decision that found the $9 billion-per-year Universal Service Fund unconstitutional.

[Industry, Advocates Hail Preservation of USF, But Say Reforms are Still NeededReactions to the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling that the Universal Service Fund is Constitutional![](https://storage.ghost.io/c/29/97/29976d9d-89ea-4c77-8c0b-0e8a0eafed35/content/images/icon/breakfast_media_llc_logo-556.jpeg)Broadband BreakfastJake Neenan![](https://storage.ghost.io/c/29/97/29976d9d-89ea-4c77-8c0b-0e8a0eafed35/content/images/thumbnail/DSCF4202-1.jpg)](https://broadbandbreakfast.com/industry-advocates-hail-preservation-of-usf-but-say-reforms-are-still-needed/)

The Federal Communications Commission program supports rural broadband networks, plus internet discounts for low-income households, schools and libraries and healthcare centers. It’s been funded since the 1990s by fees on interstate voice revenue, with the accounting work delegated to the Universal Service Administrative Company, which the FCC set up for the purpose.

Conservative nonprofit Consumers’ Research had alleged the fund was unconstitutional, arguing Congress didn’t put enough guardrails on the FCC’s ability to collect fees as part of the fund, and that the agency improperly delegated authority to USAC. The Fifth Circuit had ruled the combination of the two illegally took taxing power away from the legislature.

In a [6-3 decision](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-354%5F0861.pdf?ref=broadbandbreakfast.com) by Justice **Elena Kagan**, the court rejected both arguments.

“When Congress amended the Communications Act in 1996, it provided the Commission with clear guidance on how to promote universal service using carrier contributions,” Kagan wrote. “Our precedents do not require more. Nor do they prevent the Commission, in carrying out Congress’s policy, from obtaining the Administrator’s assistance in projecting revenues and expenses, so that carriers pay the needed amount.”

Justices **Neil Gorsuch** wrote the dissent, joined by fellow conservative Justices **Clarence Thomas** and **Samuel Alito**.

***Notice: This is a developing story, and Broadband Breakfast will update with additional details and reactions.***