Cox Fights Music Industry’s Liability Allegations at Supreme Court
Cox argued that it cannot be held responsible for user piracy, as the music industry pushes for broader liability.

Cox argued that it cannot be held responsible for user piracy, as the music industry pushes for broader liability.
WASHINGTON, Oct. 22, 2024 – Cox Communications is defending itself in a copyright infringement case where Sony Music Entertainment and other music industry players seek to hold the company liable for its subscribers' piracy and copyright infringements.
On Monday, Cox opposed Sony’s Supreme Court request to overturn a lower court ruling in Cox’s favor. Cox is urging the high court to deny the plaintiffs’ petition for a writ of certiorari, arguing that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit correctly interpreted law when it vacated an unprecedented $1 billion judgment against Cox in February.
“Plaintiffs forget that they are trying to hold Cox vicariously liable not for anything it has done, but for the infringing acts of its customers.
What constitutes an 'invidious' DEI policy in regulators' eyes?
Democrats warn the law will fall flat without a functional FTC to enforce it.
Providers had asked for several changes, including to how the agency determined the presence of unsubsidized competitors.
Supporters argue the bill would preserve agency expertise in complex rulemaking