Feds Ask Supreme Court to Preserve Universal Service Fund
FCC and Justice Department want the Fifth Circuit's July ruling, which found the $8-billion annual fund unconstitutional, overruled.

FCC and Justice Department want the Fifth Circuit's July ruling, which found the $8-billion annual fund unconstitutional, overruled.
WASHINGTON, Oct. 1, 2024 – The Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department asked the Supreme Court Monday to strike down a July ruling that found an $8 billion broadband subsidy unconstitutional.
That Fifth Circuit decision “invalidates the system that the Commission has used for a quarter century to implement an important Act of Congress,” the agencies wrote. “If left in place, the decision will upend the universal service programs, to the detriment of millions of consumers nationwide.”
The FCC’s Universal Service Fund supports building and maintaining rural broadband infrastructure, plus internet discounts for low-income households, schools, libraries, and healthcare centers. Set up in 1996, it’s funded by fees on interstate voice revenue and managed on a day-to-day basis by the Universal Service Administrative Company, which the FCC stood up for that purpose.
A bipartisan group of 115 legislators from 28 states urged caution as the Trump administration mulls rule changes.
The city promises options ranging from symmetrical 300 megabits per second to symmetrical 1 gigabit per second.
BEAD should use all technologies, but not all technologies are equal.
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr opposed moving forward with the $9 billion fund as a commissioner.