WISPA Says BEAD Contracts Risked Driving Providers Away
The Wireless Internet Service Providers Association said restrictive clauses could stall broadband construction timelines.
The Wireless Internet Service Providers Association said restrictive clauses could stall broadband construction timelines.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 26, 2025 – State broadband offices were urged by a leading trade association on Tuesday to avoid contract terms that could cause providers to abandon their Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment awards.
Join the Breakfast Breakfast Club to access this document.
The Wireless Internet Service Providers Association said the next major hurdle after NTIA approvals is converting provisional awardees into signed subgrantees. Steven Schwerbel, the group’s director of state advocacy, warned that restrictive agreements could prompt providers to walk away from multimillion-dollar projects and leave unserved locations without planned service.
The memo identified four areas where WISPA said contract language is most likely to deter participation. First, states should allow providers that won multiple project areas to consolidate them under a single agreement. Schwerbel said a unified contract would reduce reporting burdens for awardees and streamline review workloads for state broadband offices.
Site inspections found the proposed locations were already served or not valid broadband sites.
Investment firm Stonepeak will be the majority owner, with Alphabet retaining a ‘significant minority’ stake.
Co-sponsored by Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J., the bill would restrict betting on military actions, among other things
Anthropic’s supply chain risk designation is contradictory since the Defense Department has used its tools in Iran military operations, said CNAS executive vice president Paul Scharre.
Member discussion