Jonathan Romeiro: The FTTH Acceptance Checklist BEAD Projects Should Require

In my view, the most expensive delays in BEAD won’t come from trenching. They’ll show up at handoff, when a project clears construction but stumbles in operations because no one can prove—quickly and objectively—that the plant meets the standard the grant paid for.

Across multi-municipality rollouts, the pattern is consistent: acceptance packages look complete yet miss three basics. The fix is not glamorous. Publish a three-item acceptance checklist and make it part of subgrant language. Awardees keep freedom on methods and vendors; deliverables must be measurable, traceable, and usable.

Most packages include Optical Time Domain Reflectometer (OTDR) traces. Too many are decorative. Effective acceptance defines limits up front—end-to-end attenuation by wavelength, ceilings for event loss and reflectance, connector policy—and enforces launch/receive fiber practices so loss isn’t hidden. The deliverable is raw trace files in a standard format plus a one-page summary of exceptions.

When thresholds are explicit, the “argue with JPEGs” ritual ends. Disputes shrink and future troubleshooting starts from a known baseline. Field inspections show failed acceptances are usually about inconsistent criteria, not bad fiber. Set measurable limits before testing to avoid costly retesting later.

Splice-map traceability

A splice map only works if a new technician can follow it without local folklore. That means standard naming for closures, trays, and ports; version control; and cross-references to OTDR events and GIS features. If a storm or contractor cut takes out a span, restoration time depends on how fast a crew moves from the drawing to the dirt.

The opposite—hand-drawn edits with no revision history—turns every outage into archaeology. Even a simple digital log with timestamps can cut restoration time dramatically.

As-builts for operations

Construction-centric as-builts die in a PDF folder. Operations-ready as-builts include layered GIS or structured CAD, optical budgets, device inventories with model/serial/firmware, and change history. They map to the NOC’s monitoring views and SLAs so on-call engineers can validate, escalate, and resolve without reverse-engineering the project.

When documentation mirrors how the NOC works, activations speed up and chronic tickets drop.

What the numbers looked like

Where this acceptance workflow was applied, peak-hour latency fell from ~120–250 ms to ~10–30 ms, while rework and MTTR decreased. More important for grant administrators, disputes shrank because acceptance was objective and repeatable. Everyone knew what “done” meant.

How states can bake it into BEAD subgrants

OTDR Acceptance. “Awardee shall submit OTDR traces with defined pass/fail thresholds (end-to-end attenuation by wavelength, event loss, reflectance). Provide raw trace files and launch/receive documentation. Include a summary table of exceptions.”

Traceable Splice Maps. “As-built splice documentation shall use standardized naming, version control, and cross-references to OTDR events and GIS features sufficient for end-to-end tracing by field personnel.”

Operations-Ready As-Builts. “As-builts shall include GIS/CAD layers, optical budgets, device inventories (model/serial/firmware), and change history aligned to the awardee’s monitoring/SLA views. PDF is permitted, but source files shall be supplied upon request.”

Add one enforcement lever: retain a small percentage until the acceptance package is approved. Once expectations are explicit, most awardees meet the mark.

Common pitfalls to avoid

Pretty traces, bad baselines. Screenshots without limits don’t prove performance. Require thresholds and raw files.

Mystery closures. Standardize names and versions; ban untracked edits.

Shelfware as-builts. Tie documentation to NOC tools and SLA views.

“Set and forget.” Acceptance is the first baseline; update when change windows alter the plant.

BEAD is a chance to fund infrastructure and discipline. A short, boring acceptance package won’t trend on social media, and that’s the point. It prevents do-overs and delivers what the public was promised: fiber that works on day one—and is maintainable on day one-thousand.

Jonathan Romeiro is a network and security integration lead in the San Francisco Bay Area. He has delivered multi-municipality fiber corridors and operations governance in Brazil and the U.S., focusing on OTDR/splice/as-built acceptance, observability, and NOC-ready documentation. This Expert Opinion is exclusive to Broadband Breakfast.

Broadband Breakfast accepts commentary from informed observers of the broadband scene. Please send pieces to commentary@breakfast.media. The views expressed in Expert Opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the views of Broadband Breakfast and Breakfast Media LLC.