More ISPs Say Midco Misclassification Cost Them Subsidy Support
They say Midco doesn't offer voice service in their areas.

They say Midco doesn't offer voice service in their areas.
WASHINGTON, Sept. 26, 2024 – Seven more broadband providers are telling regulators they received less subsidy money than they should have because one midwest provider was misclassified.
The Federal Communications Commission’s Enhanced ACAM program subsidizes the construction and maintenance of rural broadband through the agency’s Universal Service Fund, to the tune of $18 billion over the next 15 years. It offered participants less annual support for locations in their service area that are already served by an unsubsidized competitor.
The companies say fixed wireless provider Midcontinent Communications, or Midco, was classified as an “unsubsidized competitor” when it shouldn’t have been. They say they lost out on a total of more than $800,000 in annual support between them for 1,782 locations Midco serves.
What constitutes an 'invidious' DEI policy in regulators' eyes?
Democrats warn the law will fall flat without a functional FTC to enforce it.
Providers had asked for several changes, including to how the agency determined the presence of unsubsidized competitors.
Supporters argue the bill would preserve agency expertise in complex rulemaking