Whistleblowers Want to Revive Fraud Suit Against UScellular Successor
A separate fraud case against the company, filed by the same telecom attorneys, was blessed by the D.C. Circuit in October.
A separate fraud case against the company, filed by the same telecom attorneys, was blessed by the D.C. Circuit in October.
WASHINGTON, Dec. 11, 2025 – A pair of telecom attorneys are pushing for the Supreme Court to reverse a decision that ended a fraud lawsuit against Array Digital Infrastructure, formerly UScellular.
In February, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit dismissed a case in which Mark O’Connor and Sara Leibman, a former FCC attorney, sued Array under the False Claims Act, which mandates higher penalties for fraudulently seeking government cash. They alleged Array used smaller subsidiaries to obtain spectrum auction bidding credits and buy spectrum for more than $100 million less than it could have on its own.
Array, formerly the fifth largest wireless carrier in the country, changed its name after selling those operations and a chunk of spectrum to T-Mobile for $4.3 billion. It now operates its roughly 4,400 towers.
Order tones down language of leaked draft, but continues restriction on dispensing remaining BEAD funds to states with 'onerous' AI laws.
Democrats warn the proposals would override stronger state privacy laws.
As states complete their broadband spending plans, a fight is brewing over the remaining $21 billion.
The test is planned to run through Dec. 1, 2027.
Member discussion