Supreme Court to Decide Fate of $8 Billion Broadband Fund
The outcome could affect millions who depend on the USF for affordable communication services.

The outcome could affect millions who depend on the USF for affordable communication services.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 22, 2024 – The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday that it will hear a case questioning the constitutionality of the Universal Service Fund, a $8.1 billion program critical to expanding broadband access in rural and underserved areas.
The key issue before the Court is whether the USF and its administrator, the Universal Service Administrative Company, violate the Constitution’s “non-delegation” and “private non-delegation” doctrines.
Critics argue that the Federal Communications Commission improperly delegated legislative authority to USAC, which manages the fund, and that the fee charged to telecom providers resembles a tax, which only Congress can impose.
The city promises options ranging from symmetrical 300 megabits per second to symmetrical 1 gigabit per second.
BEAD should use all technologies, but not all technologies are equal.
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr opposed moving forward with the $9 billion fund as a commissioner.
New report finds affordability mandate would cut less than 1% from top ISPs’ revenues.