Our comprehensive report examines the extremely timely issue of content moderation and Section 230 from multiple angles.
Panelists discussed the recent oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google.
Many of the arguments in Twitter v. Taamneh hinged on specific interpretations of the Anti-Terrorism Act.
During oral arguments for Gonzalez v. Google, justices repeatedly voiced concerns about potential unintended consequences.
Panelists disagreed over the merits of Section 230’s protections and the extent to which they apply.
Without Section 230, platforms whose actions are legally justified could be subject to ruinous lawsuits.
The Supreme Court is preparing to hear two cases related to content moderation and platform liability.
The RWA told the FCC its members are struggling to get loans to fulfil Rip and Replace obligations.
The Supreme Court's decision could dramatically alter the content moderation landscape.
