Solicitor General Defends Universal Service Fund at High Court
The administration argued the law standing up the $8 billion fund didn't run afoul of the non-delegation doctrine.

The administration argued the law standing up the $8 billion fund didn't run afoul of the non-delegation doctrine.
WASHINGTON, Jan. 9, 2024 – The Biden Administration Justice Department joined the Federal Communications Commission on Wednesday in urging the Supreme Court to strike down a decision holding that the agency’s $8 billion-per-year broadband subsidy was unconstitutional.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to that effect “conflicts with decades of precedent and centuries of practice; reflects a misreading of the Communications Act and the FCC’s rules; and threatens to nullify the universal service programs, to the detriment of the millions of Americans whom those programs serve,” the solicitor general's office wrote in a brief co-signed by the agency.
The Universal Service Fund supports four major programs that subsidize rural networks and internet discounts for low-income households, school, libraries, and healthcare centers. It’s funded by fees on interstate voice revenue, although lawmakers have been working to update that for some time.
Fiber deployment emerges as a common thread despite vastly different market conditions.
Permitting delays, transmission backlogs, siting fights, and supply chain gaps top the list.
The agency is investigating the company, along with Comcast and Verizon, over diversity practices.
Outdated permitting systems could stymie nuclear projects needed for tomorrow’s data centers, panelists said.