Supreme Court Sides 9-0 With Cox in Copyright Case
‘Mere knowledge that a service will be used to infringe is insufficient to establish the required intent to infringe,’ Justice Clarence Thomas wrote.
‘Mere knowledge that a service will be used to infringe is insufficient to establish the required intent to infringe,’ Justice Clarence Thomas wrote.
WASHINGTON, March 25, 2026 – The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Cox Communications in a major copyright dispute, finding the ISP was not liable for providing broadband to repeated infringers.
“Under our precedents, a company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court.
More than 50 record labels, led by Sony, had sued Cox for copyright infringement, arguing the company didn’t take its subscribers offline quickly enough after repeated music piracy.
A federal judge struck down one part of the law standing up the program, which a government lawyer has said would allow the program to move forward
More than 18,000 incidents nationwide, affecting over 11.8 million customers.
Government Officials and experts showed their support for imposing stronger penalties for infrastructure vandalism.
By January 2027, Google must share anonymized search data with rivals.