Charter, Cox Defend Merger to FCC
The companies argued they don't compete with each other and have been buffeted by subscriber losses.
The companies argued they don't compete with each other and have been buffeted by subscriber losses.
WASHINGTON, Dec. 5, 2025 – Cable companies Cox Communications and Charter Communications sought to defend their $34.5 billion merger from allegations the deal would create an internet giant with excessive market power.
The “portrayal of Charter and Cox as dominant Internet access ‘gatekeepers’ simply does not match today’s marketplace realities,” the companies wrote in a Thursday filing with the Federal Communications Commission.
“Instead, faced with declining video and broadband subscribers, Charter and Cox entered into the proposed Transaction to ensure that the combined company’s products remain attractive to customers in the highly competitive marketplaces in which it will operate.”
Experts said the bold plan was worth celebrating but warned that the government's embrace of AI tools shouldn't come at the expense of safety.
EchoStar’s Charlie Ergen reiterated the company's ‘force majeure’ argument to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr.
An NDAA provision granting Pentagon veto authority over spectrum reallocation could block commercial wireless expansion.
CCIA Europe said tech rules are strained by political infighting, inconsistent implementation, and national gold-plating.
Member discussion