Supreme Court Appears Open to FCC Fine Orders Being Nonbinding
That would preserve the agency's fine powers, but reduce the force of its forfeiture orders.
That would preserve the agency's fine powers, but reduce the force of its forfeiture orders.
WASHINGTON, April 21, 2026 – The Supreme Court wrestled Tuesday over whether the Federal Communications Commission’s process for fining telecom companies violates the U.S. Constitution.
Verizon and AT&T are asking the court to find that the agency is improperly compelling payment without providing companies their right to a jury trial. The FCC has countered the carriers had the option of refusing payment and waiting for a Justice Department collection suit, which does involve a jury.
Justices sought to poke holes in both sides’ arguments, but multiple appeared receptive to the idea that, in the absence of a jury trial, the wireless carriers weren’t legally forced to pay the more than $100 million they were fined.
The FCC's drone ruling, once aimed at China-based DJI, now covers all foreign components, and industry experts warn the broad scope may backfire on American drone dominance.
Among the 10 companies blacklisted by China are AVEOX in Simi Valley, California; Red Cat Holdings and Teal Drones, both in South Salt Lake, Utah; and IMSAR in Springville, Utah.
Society has no choice but to change in the advent of AI, although Huang has been optimistic about the technology’s potential.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has ordered regional grid operators to help large energy users connect more quickly to the grid.